Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  16 (2024)
Volume  15 (2023)
Volume  14 (2022)
Volume  13 (2021)
Volume  12 (2020)
Volume  11 (2019)
Volume  10 (2018)
Volume  9 (2017)
Volume  8 (2016)
Volume  7 (2015)
Volume  6 (2014)
Volume  5 (2013)
Volume  4 (2012)
Volume  3 (2011)
Volume  2 (2010)
Volume  1 (2009)
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE S3 ( December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Patient Perspectives on Diagnostic Delay and Inadequate Treatment: A Qualitative Research of Endometriosis in India

Mugdha Barik, Sita RD Duddi

Keywords : Diagnostic delay, Endometriosis, Focus group discussions, Patient-centered care, Patient perspective

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2544

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 03-02-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims and background: Endometriosis, a disease affecting 1 in every 10 women of reproductive age, dates as far back as 1690. Despite its prevalence, endometriosis is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed, thus earning itself the name of “missed disease”. This leads to detrimental effects such as significant financial burden, increased healthcare utilization, and decreased quality of life in low and middle income countries with a high out-of-pocket expenditure. This study aims to explore the complexities surrounding endometriosis, focusing on factors contributing to diagnostic delays and inadequate treatment from the perspective of patients. Materials and methods: A literature review was conducted by running searches using predefined keywords. However, the absence of substantial patient-centered data within existing literature raised concerns regarding the authenticity and completeness of the research, prompting our team to organize a semi-structured qualitative study (SSQS) by conducting 24 online Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) over the span of 2 years, from 2022 to 2024. A total of 202 women with surgical and histological confirmation of endometriosis were included. Their discussions were recorded, converted to transcripts using the hand-code technique, analyzed via the ATLAS.ti tool, and interpreted using a grounded theory approach. Results: Two themes emerged from the analysis: Delayed diagnosis and poor disease management. The study further revealed gaps in awareness and societal stigma exacerbating the disease's burden, affecting patients physically and mentally, imposing financial strain, and harming personal and professional relationships. Conclusion: The identified themes were interrelated and highly affected by inadequate awareness and stigma, lack of specialized healthcare professionals, medical malpractice, and misinformation. Going forward, it is crucial to develop tailored, patient-centered strategies for endometriosis care that address both the physical symptoms and the complex psychosocial impacts. Clinical significance: This study highlights the need for improved medical protocols and healthcare policies to enhance the quality of life for women suffering from endometriosis in India.

PDF Share
  1. Eskenazi B, Warner ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1997;24(2):235–258. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8.
  2. Eisenberg V, Weil C, Chodick G, et al. Epidemiology of endometriosis: A large population-based database study from a healthcare provider with 2 million members. BJOG 2018;125(1):55–62. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14711.
  3. Smolarz B, Szyłło K, Romanowicz H. Endometriosis: Epidemiology, classification, pathogenesis, treatment and genetics (Review of Literature). Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(19):10554. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910554.
  4. Fauconnier A, Drioueche H, Huchon C, et al. Early identification of women with endometriosis by means of a simple patient-completed questionnaire screening tool: A diagnostic study. Fertil Steril 2021;116(6):1580–1589. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07. 1205.
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Endometriosis Factsheet. [online] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis. [Last accessed October, 2024].
  6. Saunders PTK, Horne AW. Endometriosis: Etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell 2021;184(11):2807–2824. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.041.
  7. Rolla E. Endometriosis: Advances and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. F1000Res 2019;8:529. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.14817.1.
  8. Bulun SE, Yilmaz BD, Sison C, et al. Endometriosis. Endocr Rev 2019;40(4):1048–1079. DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00242.
  9. Cornillie FJ, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns JM, et al. Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: Histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril 1990;53(6):978–983. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53570-5.
  10. International working group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES; Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, et al. An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021 Nov;28(11):1849-1859. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.032.
  11. Gemmell LC, Webster KE, Kirtley S, et al. The management of menopause in women with a history of endometriosis: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23(4):481–500. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx011.
  12. Lamceva J, Uljanovs R, Strumfa I. The main theories on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(5):4254. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054254.
  13. Wang Y, Nicholes K, Shih IM. The origin and pathogenesis of endometriosis. annual review of pathology: Mechanisms of disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2020;15(1):71–95. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032654.
  14. Koninckx PR, Fernandes R, Ussia A, et al. Pathogenesis based diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:745548. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.745548.
  15. Amro B, Ramirez Aristondo ME, Alsuwaidi S, et al. New Understanding of diagnosis, treatment and prevention of endometriosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(11):6725. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116725.
  16. Márki G, Vásárhelyi D, Rigó A, et al. Challenges of and possible solutions for living with endometriosis: A qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2022;22(1):20. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01603-6.
  17. National Guideline Alliance (UK). Signs and symptoms of endometriosis (monitoring and referral). [online] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536044/. [Last accessed October, 2024].
  18. Palshetkar N. Key practice points Indian perspective. A FOGSI President's Initiative. [online] Available from: https://www.fogsi.org/wp-content/uploads/tog/KPP_Key_Practice_Points_on_Endometriosis_Final.pdf. [Last accessed October, 2024].
  19. Moore C, Cogan N, Williams L. A qualitative investigation into the role of illness perceptions in endometriosis-related quality of life. J Health Psychol 2023;28(12):1157–1171. DOI: 10.1177/13591053231183230.
  20. Della Corte L, Di Filippo C, Gabrielli O, et al. The burden of endometriosis on women's lifespan: A narrative overview on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(13):4683. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134683.
  21. DiBenedetti D, Soliman AM, Gupta C, et al. Patients’ perspectives of endometriosis-related fatigue: Qualitative interviews. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020;4(1):33. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00200-1.
  22. Cromeens MG, Carey ET, Robinson WR, et al. Timing, delays and pathways to diagnosis of endometriosis: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021;11(6):e049390. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049390.
  23. Verket NJ, Falk RS, Qvigstad E, et al. Development of a prediction model to aid primary care physicians in early identification of women at high risk of developing endometriosis: cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019;9(12):e030346. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030346.
  24. Armour M, Sinclair J, Ng CHM, Hyman MS, Lawson K, Smith CA, et al. Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain have similar impact on women, but time to diagnosis is decreasing: An Australian survey. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):16253. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73389-2.
  25. Young K, Fisher J, Kirkman M. Women's experiences of endometriosis: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2015;41(3):225–234. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100853.
  26. Allaire C, Bedaiwy MA, Yong PJ. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Can Med Assoc J 2023;195(10):E363–E371. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220637.
  27. Hudson N. The missed disease? Endometriosis as an example of ‘undone science.’ Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2022;14:20–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.003.
  28. Frankel LR. A 10-year journey to diagnosis with endometriosis: An autobiographical case report. Cureus 2022;14(1):e21329. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21329.
  29. Armour M, Lawson K, Wood A, et al. The cost of illness and economic burden of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Australia: A national online survey. PLoS One 2019;14(10):e0223316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223316.
  30. Darbà J, Marsà A. Economic implications of endometriosis: A review. Pharmacoeconomics 2022;40(12):1143–1158. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01211-0.
  31. Gao X, Outley J, Botteman M, et al. Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2006;86(6):1561–1572. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.015.
  32. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, India. Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Nutrition (RMNCAH+N). [online] Available from: https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1& level=1&sublinkid=794&lid=168#:~:text=Reproductive%2C%20Maternal%2C%20Newborn%2C%20Child,National%20Health%20Mission%20(NHM). [Last accessed October, 2024].
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.