Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2023 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Prediction by fullPIERS Model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) in Preeclampsia Patients for Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Kulsoom Ahmad, Richa Singh, Poonam Yadav

Keywords : fullPIERS model, Prediction of severity of preeclampsia, Prospective cohort study, Risk calculation by fullPIERS calculator

Citation Information : Ahmad K, Singh R, Yadav P. Prediction by fullPIERS Model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) in Preeclampsia Patients for Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2023; 15 (2):147-152.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2092

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 11-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Introduction: Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal mortality worldwide. Preeclampsia complicates 2–8% of pregnancies globally. Despite the serious clinical consequences, there is currently no effective preventive measure for preeclampsia; hence, the focus has shifted to identifying good predictors for diagnosing the severity of preeclampsia. Material and methods: This was a prospective cohort hospital-based study done in our Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SN Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India over a period of 12 months from January 2020 to January 2021. A total of 400 women were found to be eligible for the study after meeting inclusion criteria. All patients underwent detailed evaluation and investigation and the risk was calculated using the preeclampsia integrated estimate of risk (fullPIERS) calculator. All patients were followed weekly till delivery. Adverse maternal and fetal outcome were assessed. If the predicted probability of the adverse outcome came out to be ≥30%, then the case was considered as high risk. T-test and Chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis as appropriate. Results: Considering our cut-off value ≥30% in our study, out of 384 patients, 82 were categorized into high-risk group; among them, 54 (65.85%) patients had adverse maternal outcome (χ2 = 96.413, p ≤ 0.0001). Among 377 patients, excluding seven women who expired in antenatal period, 75 patients (19.89%) were categorized into high-risk group (≥30% predicted probability), among them, 59 (78.67%) patients had adverse fetal outcome (χ2 = 96.413, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion: The fullPIERS model successfully stratifies population into clinically relevant high-risk categories by using few important clinical and biochemical parameters and does not require extensive laboratory testing. It is economically feasible and quick to use, and predicts probability of an adverse outcome. Thus, the timely referral to higher center will help in having a significant impact in reducing the maternal morbidity and mortality; and perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with preeclampsia in low resource settings.

PDF Share
  1. Payne B, Hodgson S, Hutcheon J, et al. Performance of the fullPIERS model in predicting adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia using patient data from the PIERS (pre-eclampsia integrated estimate of risk) cohort, collected on admission. BJOG 2013;120(1):113–118. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03496.x.
  2. Agarwal S, Maitra N. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in preeclampsia using a risk prediction model. J Obstet and Gynaecol India 2016;66(Suppl 1):104–111. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-015-0779-5.
  3. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135(6):e237–e260. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891.
  4. Pre-eclampsia integrated estimate of risk (PIERS) Calculator. Accessed 29-06-2022.
  5. Anitha GS, Krishnappa TK, Shivamurthy G, et al. Maternal and fetal outcome in HELLP syndrome: an observational study. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2020;12(3):122–132. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1779.
  6. Ni Y, Cheng W. Comparison of indications of pregnancy termination and prognosis of mothers and neonates in early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2016;35(3):315–322. DOI: 10.3109/10641955.2016.1143486.
  7. Srivastava S, Parihar BC, Jain N. PIERS calculator predicting adverse maternal outcome in preeclampsia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6(4):1200–1205. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170889.
  8. Bhamri SS, Singh U, Mehrotra S, et al. Association of mean platelet volume in the late first trimester of pregnancy and development of preeclampsia. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2019;11(3):172–174. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1672.
  9. Dadhich S, Agrawal S, Soni M, et al. Predictive value of platelet indices in development of preeclampsia. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2012;4(1):17–21. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1164.
  10. Thangaratinam S, Koopmans CM, Iyengar S, et al. Accuracy of liver function tests for predicting adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90(6):574–585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01112.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.