Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2022 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Protecting and Promoting Respectful Maternity Care of Every Laboring Woman in Sri Lanka beyond the Pandemic: A Narrative Review

Malitha Patabendige, Asanka Jayawardane

Keywords : Abuse, Childbirth, Disrespect, Obstetric violence, Respectful maternity care

Citation Information : Patabendige M, Jayawardane A. Protecting and Promoting Respectful Maternity Care of Every Laboring Woman in Sri Lanka beyond the Pandemic: A Narrative Review. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2022; 14 (5):627-632.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2117

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 16-11-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To summarize the current status of respectful maternity care (RMC) in Sri Lanka and the way forward with the pandemic. Background: Respectful maternity care is a human right with the capacity to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Promoting respect at interpersonal and health system levels attracts more women to the health facilities, gives them a positive birth experience, attenuates preventable maternal deaths, improves perinatal outcomes, and minimizes gaps and inequities in women's health. Irrespective of the personal, resource availability, cultural, or any other issue, efforts need to be taken to implement all the domains of RMC in all birthing suites. Methodology: A comprehensive literature review was carried out on Google Scholar and MEDLINE databases to find out the relevant scientific literature on the RMC in the South Asian and the Sri Lankan context. The focus was given to identify the current concepts and the strategies to improve the RMC in the South Asian setting. Review results: We have summarized the various aspects of the RMC, its dimensions, measurement of RMC, the impact of RMC and its importance. The RMC in the South Asian setting needs to be developed in various aspects. Conclusion: The provision of RMC needs concern as a priority measure. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic has implications, especially in allowing a labor companion. However, promoting of RMC could be performed in micro, meso/intermediate, and macro/national levels. Clinical significance: The present challenges and the proposed strategies in achieving this best practice need to be considered in Sri Lanka and other South Asian settings.


PDF Share
  1. The White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood. Respectful maternity care: The universal rights of childbearing women. White Ribb Alliance Safe Mother. 2011. Available at: http://whiteribbonalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Final_RMC_Charter.pdf. Accessed on: 2 January 2022.
  2. Browser, D. Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: Report of a landscape analysis. Bethesda, MD: USAID-TRAction Project, University Research Corporation, LLC, and Harvard School of Public Health. 2010.
  3. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLOS Med 2015;12(6):e1001847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
  4. Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: A qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;125(8):932–942. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15015.
  5. Bulto GA, Demissie DB, Tulu AS. Respectful maternity care during labor and childbirth and associated factors among women who gave birth at health institutions in the West Shewa zone, Oromia region, Central Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20(1):443. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03135-z.
  6. Pathak P, Ghimire B. Perception of women regarding respectful maternity care during facility-based childbirth. Obstet Gynecol Int 2020;2020:5142398. DOI: 10.1155/2020/5142398.
  7. Hajizadeh K, Vaezi M, Meedya S, et al. Respectful maternity care and its related factors in maternal units of public and private hospitals in Tabriz: A sequential explanatory mixed method study protocol. Reprod Health 2020;17(1):9. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-0863-x.
  8. Patabendige M, Agampodi SB, Jayawardane A. Perceptions on respectful maternity care in Sri Lanka: Study protocol for a mixed- methods study of patients and providers. POLS One 2021;16(5): e0250920. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250920.
  9. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: A systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet 2016;387(10017):462–474. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7.
  10. World Health Organization, UNICEF. Countdown to 2015. Building a future for women and children: The 2012 Report. 2012. Available at: http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/documents/2012Report/2012-complete-no-profiles.pdf. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  11. United Nations. The sustainable development soals. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed on: 3 January 2022.
  12. Reed R, Sharman R, Inglis C. Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1197-0. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  13. Senanayake H, Goonewardene M, Ranatunga A, et al. Achieving millennium development goals 4 and 5 in Sri Lanka. 2011;118(Suppl 2): 78–87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03115.x.
  14. Family Health Bureau. National Statistics. 2020. Available at: https://fhb.health.gov.lk/index.php/en/statistics. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  15. Bureau, Family Health SL. Annual Report of the Family Health Bureau 2017. 2017. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sIAnkf1okrinQI3VDCtOokPtf9vvc94o/view. Accessed on: 08 January 2022.
  16. Wijesinghe PA, K Jayaratne DP. National maternal death surveillance and response: Sri Lankan scenario. Ceylon Med J 2020;64(1):1–3. DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v64i1.8822.
  17. Agampodi TC, Agampodi SB, Wickramasinghe WA, et al. Post partum depression: A problem that needs urgent attention. Ceylon Med J 2011;56(4):183–184. DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v56i4.3907.
  18. Patabendige M, Athulathmudali SR, Chandrasinghe SK. Mental health problems during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A multicenter knowledge assessment survey among healthcare providers. J Pregnancy 2020;2020:4926702. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4926702.
  19. WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO recommendation on respectful maternity care. The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. Available at: https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/care-during-childbirth/who-recommendation-respectful-maternity-care-during-labour-and-childbirth. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  20. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Aialable at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  21. Morton CH, Simkin P. Can respectful maternity care save and improve lives? Birth 2019;46(3):391–395. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12444.
  22. Patterson J, Martin CH, Karatzias T. PTSD post-childbirth: A systematic review of women's and midwives’ subjective experiences of care provider interaction. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2019;37(1):56–83. DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2018.1504285.
  23. Roth LM, Morton CH, Henley MM, et al. Bearing witness: United States and Canadian maternity support workers’ observations of disrespectful care in childbirth. Birth 2018;45(3):263–274. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12373.
  24. Giordano J, Surita FG. The role of the respectful maternity care model in São Paulo, Brazil: A cross-sectional study. Birth 2019;46(3):509–516. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12448.
  25. Srivastava A, Singh D, Montagu D, et al. Putting women at the center: A review of Indian policy to address person-centered care in maternal and newborn health, family planning and abortion. BMC Public Health 2017;18(1):1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4575-2.
  26. Pérez D'gregorio R. Obstetric violence: A new legal term introduced in Venezuela. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2010;111(3):201–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.002.
  27. Perera D, Lund R, Swahnberg K, et al. ‘When helpers hurt’: women's and midwives’ stories of obstetric violence in state health institutions, Colombo district, Sri Lanka. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18(1): 2–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1869-z.
  28. Sheferaw ED, Mengesha TZ, Wase SB. Development of a tool to measure women's perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:67. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0848-5.
  29. Ayoubi S, Pazandeh F, Simbar M, et al. A questionnaire to assess women's perception of respectful maternity care (WP-RMC): Development and psychometric properties. Midwifery 2020;80:102573. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102573.
  30. Vedam S, Stoll K, Rubashkin N, et al. The mothers on respect (MOR) index: Measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth. SSM Popul Heal 2017;3:201–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.005.
  31. Taavoni S, Goldani Z, Gooran NR, et al. Development and assessment of respectful maternity care questionnaire in Iran. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2018;6(4):334–349. PMID: 30465006.
  32. Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF). Respectful maternity care. Available at: https://www.mhtf.org/topics/respectful-maternity-care/. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  33. Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D, et al. ‘Not enough people to look after you’: An exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland. Midwifery 2012;28(1):98–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.11.007.
  34. Cook K, Loomis C. The impact of choice and control on women's childbirth experiences. J Perinat Educ 2012;21(3):158–168. DOI: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158.
  35. Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004;46(2):212–219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648. 2003.02981.x.
  36. World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. 2015. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/134588/WHO_RHR_14.23_cze.pdf. Accessed on: 10 January 2022.
  37. Souza J, Tunçalp Ö, Vogel J, et al. Obstetric transition: The pathway towards ending preventable maternal deaths. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121(Suppl 1):1–4. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12735.
  38. Patabendige M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Research proposal for translation and validation into Sinhala language among a Lankan cohort of women. BMC Res Notes 2019;12(1):458. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4499-2.
  39. Patabendige M, Palihawadana TS, Herath RP, et al. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: Translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language. BMC Res Notes 2020;13(1):534. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z.
  40. Rishard M, Fahmy FF, Senanayake H, et al. Correlation among experience of personcentered maternity care, provision of care and women's satisfaction: Cross sectional study in Colombo, Sri Lanka. PLoS One 2021;16(4):e0249265. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249265.
  41. Patabendige M, Senanayake H. Implementation of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program at a tertiary care setting in Sri Lanka: A developing country experience. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2015;15:12. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0436-0.
  42. Senanayke HM, Patabendige M, Ramachandran R. Experience with a context-specific modified WHO safe childbirth checklist at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2018;18(1):411. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2040-6.
  43. Word Health Organization. WHO safe childbirth checklist implementation guide. 2015. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/199177/1/9789241549455_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  44. Senanayake HM, Patabendige M, Ramachandran R. Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes 2018;11(1):896. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y.
  45. McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: Effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth 2008;35(2):92–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x.
  46. Bertsch TD, Nagashima–Whalcn L, Dykcman S, et al. Labor support by first-time fathers: Direct observations with a comparison to experienced doulas. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1990;11(4):251–260. DOI: 10.3109/01674829009084421.
  47. World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on companionship during labour and childbirth. 2018. Available at: https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/care-during-childbirth/who-recommendation-respectful-maternity-care-during-labour-and-childbirth. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  48. Senanayake HM, Somawardana UABP, Samarasinghe M. Effect of a female labour companion and of educating her regarding support during labour on perinatal and labour outcomes. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;35(4):112. DOI: 10.4038/sljog.v35i4.6584.
  49. Senanayake H, Wijesinghe RD, Nayar KR. Is the policy of allowing a female labor companion feasible in developing countries? Results from a cross sectional study among Sri Lankan practitioners. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17(1):392. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1578-z.
  50. Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka. Maternal care package A guide to field healthcare workers. 2011. Available at: https://medicine.kln.ac.lk/depts/publichealth/Fixed_Learning/clearkship/3.PHM/maternal_care_package_a_guide_to_field_healthcare_workers_english.pdf. Accessed on: 5 January 2022.
  51. Umenai T, Wagner M, Page LA. Conference agreement on the definition of humanization and humanized care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001;75(Suppl 1):S3–S4. PMID: 11742638.
  52. Patabendige M, Gamage MM, Weerasinghe M, et al. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant women in Sri Lanka. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2020;151(1):150–153. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13335.
  53. Patabendige M, Gamage MM, Jayawardane A, et al. The potential impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care as perceived by non-COVID-19 pregnant women: Women's experience research brief. J Pateint Exp 2021;8:2374373521998820. DOI: 10.1177/23743735 21998820.
  54. Song S, Yang X, Yang H, et al. Psychological resilience as a protective factor for depression and anxiety among the public during the outbreak of COVID-19. Front Psychol 2020;11:618509. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.618509.
  55. Asefa A. Unveiling respectful maternity care as a way to address global inequities in maternal health. BMJ Glob Health 2021;6(1):e003559. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003559.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.