Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mindful Digital Program–based Interventions and their Role in Pregnancy and Fetal Outcomes

Jaideep Malhotra, Narendra Malhotra, Madhuri Patil, Neharika Malhotra, Ruchika Garg

Keywords : Baby Care Program, Baby blues, Fetal development, Mother–fetal attachment, Nuclear family, Pregnancy, Stressors

Citation Information : Malhotra J, Malhotra N, Patil M, Malhotra N, Garg R. Mindful Digital Program–based Interventions and their Role in Pregnancy and Fetal Outcomes. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2021; 13 (3):174-179.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1909

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

The joint family system provides a support system especially for children, young parents, and parents-to-be and is a major factor in their survival, health, education, development, and protection. It has the major potential to provide stability and support when there are problems. The joint family system even in India is on the decline, and nuclear families are on the rise both in urban and rural areas. This has left the pregnant woman with little or no family support to fall back on, which can be a cause of stress and thus affect the outcome of pregnancy. Moreover, during the COVID, the medical support was also limited, which has added to the distress. Stress in the mother can result in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with resultant low-birth-weight babies, preterm delivery, adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes for the child, and developmental delays in babies, and all these need to be avoided. iMumz pregnancy, the baby care and parenting digital program, has sought to address these issues by partnering closely with pregnant women, offering a wide range of assistance and activities for maternal well-being in the comfort of their own homes. This study captures the responses and pregnancy outcomes of the women who have used the iMumz pregnancy digital program during pregnancy. Materials and methods: This longitudinal study (panel study) was conducted on 512 primigravidas. The study group included 255 pregnant women who opted for a digital holistic health program: “Baby Care Program” (BCP), while the control group consisted of 257 pregnant women who received no such interventions. The BCP included mindfulness meditation, 3 hours of yoga and breathing practices every week, 2 hours of harmonizing music every week, 1 hour of baby bonding activities every week, and 1 hour of personalized diet and pregnancy education each week. The data were collected at 15 and 35 weeks of pregnancy and then from 1 month until 6 months of postdelivery. Results: The study showed a statistically significant improvement in sleep patterns and stress levels. It also showed a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of preterm delivery and low birth weight and a better maternal–fetal bonding or attachment (MFA) in the BCP study group compared to the control group. After initiation of BCP activities in the App, 88% of the patients reported a significant reduction in stress. The BCP study group also reported a higher sense of mastery in coping with postpartum blues. Eighty percent of the control group reported postpartum blues as compared to 19% of the BCP users. Moreover, 81.4% of the BCP study group reported more sense of control in managing their pregnancies, despite the stressful COVID environment. Conclusion: The BCP activities, such as meditation, yoga and breathing exercise, harmonizing music, baby bonding activities and personalized diet, and pregnancy education, have helped pregnant women to reduce their stress levels with improvement in sleep quality, increased a sense of control over diet and nutrition, and educated about MFA. The use of BCP has also positively correlated with better early childhood development and milestones.


PDF Share
  1. Sonawat R. Understanding families in India: A reflection of societal changes. Psic Teor e Pesq 2001;17(2):177–186. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-37722001000200010.
  2. Singh JP. Nuclearisation of household and family in urban India. Sociol Bull 2003;52(1):53–72.
  3. Carburg J. Postpartum depression statistics [Internet]. Postpartum depression; 2021. Available from: https://www.postpartumdepression.org/resources.
  4. Werner EA, Myers MM, Fifer WP, et al. Prenatal predictors of infant temperament. Dev Psychobiol 2007;49(5):474-84. DOI: 10.1002/dev.20232.
  5. Abasi E, Tafazzoli M, Esmaily H, et al. The effect of maternal–fetal attachment education on maternal mental health. Turk J Med Sci 2013;43(5):815–820. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1204-97.
  6. Singh J. Garbhsanskar mental and intellectual development of unborn child. J Neonatal Stud 2021;1(1). Available from: https://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/garbhsanskar-mental-and-intellectual-development-of-unborn-child.pdf.
  7. Arya R, Chansoria M, Konanki R, et al. Maternal music exposure during pregnancy influences neonatal behaviour: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Pediatr 2012;2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/901812.
  8. Cranley MS. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res 1981;30(5):281–284.
  9. Rezaei E, Moghadam ZB, Saraylu K. Quality of life in pregnant women with sleep disorder. J Family Reprod Health 2013;7(2):87–93.
  10. Chang JJ, Pien GW, Duntley SP, et al. Sleep deprivation during pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes: is there a relationship? Sleep Med Rev 2010;14(2):107–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.05.001.
  11. Rondung E, Thomtén J, Sundin Ö. Psychological perspectives on fear of childbirth. J Anxiety Disord 2016;44:80–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.007.
  12. Hoseini ES, Rahmati R, Shaghaghi F, et al. The relationship between hope and happiness with prenatal care. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:206. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_141_20.
  13. Monk C, Feng T, Lee S, et al. Distress during pregnancy: epigenetic regulation of placenta glucocorticoid-related genes and fetal neurobehavior. Am J Psychiatry 2016;173(7):705–713. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091171.
  14. Glover V, O'Donnell KJ, O'Connor TG, et al. Prenatal maternal stress, fetal programming, and mechanisms underlying later psychopathology—a global perspective. Dev Psychopathol 2018;30(3):843–854. DOI: 10.1017/S095457941800038X.
  15. Tsao CM, Hsing HC, Wang HH, et al. The factors related to maternal-fetal attachment: examining the effect of mindfulness, stress and symptoms during pregnancy. Arch Nurs Pract Care 2019;5(1):1–7. DOI: 10.17352/2581-4265.000035.
  16. Rossen L, Hutchinson D, Wilson J, et al. Maternal bonding through pregnancy and postnatal: findings from an Australian longitudinal study. Am J Perinatol 2017;34(8):808–817. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599052.
  17. Deshpande J. The effect of selected aspect of Garbha Sanskar on stress, coping strategies and wellbeing of antenatal mothers. Int J Sci Res 2016;5(3):588–591.
  18. Fox NA, Nelson III CA, Zeanah CH. The effects of psychosocial deprivation on attachment: lessons from the Bucharest early intervention project. Psychodyn Psychiatry 2017;45(4):441–450. DOI: 10.1521/pdps.2017.45.4.441.
  19. Rafii F, Alinejad-Naeini M, Peyrovi H. Maternal role attainment in mothers with term neonate: a hybrid concept analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2020;25:304–313. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_201_19.
  20. Posner J, Cha J, Roy AK, et al. Alterations in amygdala–prefrontal circuits in infants exposed to prenatal maternal depression. Transl Psychiatry 2016;6:e935. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2016.146.
  21. Rifkin-Graboi A, Bai J, Chen H, et al. Prenatal maternal depression associates with microstructure of right amygdala in neonates at birth. Biol Psychiatry 2013;74(11):837–844. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.019.
  22. Qiu A, Anh TT, Li Y, et al. Prenatal maternal depression alters amygdala functional connectivity in 6-month-old infants. Transl Psychiatry 2015;5:e508. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2015.3.
  23. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, et al. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106 (5 Part 1):1071–1083. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db.
  24. Lindgren K. Relationships among maternal–fetal attachment, prenatal depression, and health practices in pregnancy. Res Nurs Health 2001;24(3):203–217. DOI: 10.1002/nur.1023.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.