Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2020 ) > List of Articles

EDITORIAL

Consumption of Nonnutritive Sweeteners during Pregnancy

Abhivyakti Kapoor, Gangadhar Sahoo

Citation Information : Kapoor A, Sahoo G. Consumption of Nonnutritive Sweeteners during Pregnancy. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2020; 12 (4):199-202.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1801

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-09-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

HTML PDF Share
  1. Association of early life exposure to bisphenol A with obesity and cardiometabolic traits in childhood. Environ Res 2016;146:379–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.017.
  2. Environmental pollutants and child health-a review of recent concerns. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2016;219(4-5):331–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.05.001.
  3. 575. Exposure to toxic environmental agents. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122(4):931–935. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435416.21944.54.
  4. Nonnutritive sweeteners: current use and health perspectives: a scientific statement from the american heart association and the american diabetes association. Diabetes Care 2012;35(8):1798–1808. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-9002.
  5. Noncaloric sweeteners in children: a controversial theme. Bio Med Res Int 2018;2018:4806534. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4806534.
  6. Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2016;17(2):179–186. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-016-9372-1.
  7. Consumption of low-calorie sweeteners among children and adults in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017;117(3):441–448.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.004.
  8. Additional information about high-intensity sweeteners permitted for use in food in the United States. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/additional-information-about-high-intensity-sweeteners-permitted-use-food-united-states. Accessed August 9, 2019.
  9. Separate circuitries encode the hedonic and nutritional values of sugar. Nat Neurosci 2016;19(3):465–470. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4224.
  10. The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 2006;444(7117):288–294. DOI: 10.1038/nature05401.
  11. Sugars, sweet taste receptors, and brain responses. Nutrients 2017;9(7):653. DOI: 10.3390/nu9070653.
  12. Effects of sucralose on insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition 2018;55-56:125–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.04.001.
  13. Sucralose decreases insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2018;108(3):485–491. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy152.
  14. Sucralose affects glycemic and hormonal responses to an oral glucose load. Diabetes Care 2013;36(9):2530–2535. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2221.
  15. Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners. Physiol Behav 2015;152:450–455. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.024##MargolskeeRF, Dyer J, Kokrashvili Z, et al. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of na+-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:15075–15080.
  16. Gut-expressed gustducin and taste receptors regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1. ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 2007;104(38):15069–15074. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706890104.
  17. Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2013;24(9):431–441. DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.05.005.
  18. Sucralose enhances GLP-1 release and lowers blood glucose in the presence of carbohydrate in healthy subjects but not in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69(2):162–166. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.208.
  19. Artificial sweeteners stimulate adipogenesis and suppress lipolysis independently of sweet taste receptors. J Biol Chem 2013;288(45):32475–32489. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.514034.
  20. Gut microbiome response to sucralose and its potential role in inducing liver inflammation in mice. Front Physiol 2017;8:487. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00487.
  21. The antimicrobial activity of the three commercially available intense sweeteners against common periodontal pathogens: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(6):749–752. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1222.
  22. Small changes in dietary sugar and physical activity as an approach to preventing excessive weight gain: the America on the move family study. Pediatrics 2007;120(4):e869–e879. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2927.
  23. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med 2012;367(15):1397–1406. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203034.
  24. Effects of a low-glycemic load vs low-fat diet in obese young adults: a randomized trial. JAMA 2007;297(19):2092–2102. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.19.2092.
  25. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of sucralose in the mouse. Food Chem Toxicol 2000;38(Suppl 2):S107–S110. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00032-6.
  26. The disposition of saccharin in animals and man—a review. Food Chem Toxicol 1985;23(4-5):429–435. DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(85)90136-X.
  27. Metabolism of aspartame by human and pig intestinal microvillar peptidases. Biochem J 1994;298(3):635–639. DOI: 10.1042/bj2980635.
  28. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993-2020.
  29. In vitro metabolism of the glycosidic sweeteners, stevia mixture and enzymatically modified stevia in human intestinal microflora. Food Chem Toxicol 2003;41(3):359–374. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00235-1.
  30. Digestion of stevioside, a natural sweetener, by various digestive enzymes. J Clin Biochem Nutr 1997;23(3):177–186. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.23.177.
  31. Maternal exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners impacts progeny's metabolism and microbiome. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1360. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01360.
  32. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/40288. Accessed January 6, 2020.
  33. Tissue levels of saccharin in the rat during two-generation feeding studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1982;62(3):465–473. DOI: 10.1016/0041-008X(82)90147-8.
  34. Nonnutritive sweeteners in breast milk. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2015;78(16):1029–1032. DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2015.1053646.
  35. Pharmacokinetics of sucralose and acesulfame-potassium in breast milk following ingestion of diet soda. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018;66(3):466–470. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001817.
  36. Diet soft drink consumption is associated with an increased risk of vascular events in the northern manhattan study. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(9):1120–1126. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1968-2.
  37. Administration of saccharin to neonatal mice influences body composition of adult males and reduces body weight of females. Endocrinology 2014;155(4):1313–1326. DOI: 10.1210/en.2013-1995.
  38. Dietary intake and the development of the metabolic syndrome: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Circulation 2008;117(6):754–761. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.716159.
  39. Effects of the non-nutritive sweeteners on glucose metabolism and appetite regulating hormones: systematic review of observational prospective studies and clinical trials. PLoS ONE 2016;11(8):e0161264. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161264.
  40. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. Circulation 2007;116((5):480–488. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.689935.
  41. Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93(6):1321–1327. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.007922.
  42. Metabolic and behavioural effects of prenatal exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rodent models. Physiol Behav 2020;213:112696. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112696.
  43. Effect of sodium saccharin on the neonatal rat bladder. Scanning Microsc 1995;9:137–147. discussion 148.
  44. Rebaudio-side A: two-generation reproductive toxicity study in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;46(Suppl 7):S21–S30. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.005.
  45. Effects of in utero and postnatal sodium saccharin exposure on the nutritional status of the young rat. II. Dose response and reversibility. Food Chem Toxicol 1991;29(10):669–679. DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(91)90124-P.
  46. No detriment in taste response or expression in offspring of mice fed representative levels of sucrose or non-caloric sucralose while pregnant. Physiol Behav 2018;184:39–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.11.001.
  47. Sweet preference modified by early experience in mice and the related molecular modulations on the peripheral pathway. J Mol Neurosci 2013;51:225–236.
  48. Aspartame: assessment of developmental psychotoxicity of a new artificial sweetener. Neurobehav Toxicol 1979;1:79–86.
  49. Sucralose: lack of effects on sperm glycolysis and reproduction in the rat. Food Chem Toxicol 2000;38(Suppl 2):S19–S29. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00025-9.
  50. Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity to the urinary bladder of sodium saccharin in the in uteroexposed rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980;54:57–75.
  51. Metabolic and feeding behavior alterations provoked by prenatal exposure to aspartame. Appetite 2015;87:168–174.
  52. Interactive effects of neonatal exposure to monosodium glutamate and aspartame on glucose homeostasis. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2012;9:58.
  53. Gender dimorphism in aspartame-induced impairment of spatial cognition and insulin sensitivity. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e31570.
  54. Effects of mother's dietary exposure to acesulfame-K in pregnancy or lactation on the adult offspring's sweet preference. Chem Senses 2011;36:763–770.
  55. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:11070–11075.
  56. Akkermansia muciniphila inversely correlates with the onset of inflammation, altered adipose tissue metabolism and metabolic disorders during obesity in mice. Sci Rep 2015;5:16643.
  57. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:9066–9071.
  58. Consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks in pregnancy and risk of child asthma and allergic rhinitis. PLoS ONE 2013;8(2):e57261. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057261.
  59. Association between intake of artificially sweetened and sugar-sweetened beverages and preterm delivery: a large prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96(3):552–559. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031567.
  60. Association between artificially sweetened beverage consumption during pregnancy and infant body mass index. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170(7):662–670. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0301.
  61. Beverage intake during pregnancy and childhood adiposity. Pediatrics 2017;140(2):e20170031. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-0031.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.