Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Role of MRI in the Diagnosis of Fetal Anomalies at 18–20 Weeks Gestational Age

Akshaya Mohan, Rajeswaran Rangasami, Anupama Chandrasekharan, Indrani Suresh, Suresh Seshadri

Keywords : Antenatal MRI, Fetal anomalies, Pregnancy, Prenatal MRI

Citation Information : Mohan A, Rangasami R, Chandrasekharan A, Suresh I, Seshadri S. Role of MRI in the Diagnosis of Fetal Anomalies at 18–20 Weeks Gestational Age. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2019; 11 (5):292-296.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1714

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies at 18–20 weeks of gestation. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed fetal MRI examinations done during June 2014–May 2018. There were 23 referrals for fetuses at 18–20 weeks gestation, out of the total 330 referrals for fetal anomaly evaluation. The MR images were read independently by two radiologists. When there was discrepancy in the diagnosis, the final diagnosis was arrived by consensus. Results: There were 23 examinations for fetuses at 18–20 weeks of gestational age that showed 27 anomalies. This included 22 central nervous system (CNS), 2 thoracic, 1 gastrointestinal, 1 genitourinary, and 1 miscellaneous anomalies. In the 23 pregnant women, termination of pregnancy was carried out in 18 and three women were managed conservatively. Follow-up was lost in two women. Conclusion: MRI is a complementary tool to ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. With advancement of MRI scanner technology and growth of knowledge, more number of anomalies can be diagnosed at or before 20 weeks gestational age. Clinical significance: Diagnosing fetal anomalies at or before 20 weeks by MRI is challenging because of increased fetal movements and small size of the fetus. However, improved techniques may facilitate early detection. This becomes a necessity in some countries where elective termination of pregnancy is allowed only up to 20 weeks. This article highlights that MRI can also provide additional information on select cases during 18–20 weeks.

  1. Kashyap N, Pradhan M, Singh N, et al. Early detection of fetal malformation, a long distance yet to cover! present status and potential of first trimester ultrasonography in detection of fetal congenital malformation in a developing country: experience at a tertiary care centre in India. J Pregnancy 2015;2015:623059. DOI: 10.1155/2015/623059.
  2. Rajeswaran R, Chandrasekharan A, Joseph S, et al. Ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22(2):115–123. DOI: 10.1080/14767050802488238.
  3. Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27(8):1604–1611.
  4. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47(6):690–697. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14900.
  5. Rajeswaran R, Chandrasekharan A, Joseph S, et al. Magnetic resonance signal intensity measurements in the diagnosis of fetal central nervous system anomalies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(6):679–686. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.594116.
  6. Sohn YS, Kim MJ, Kwon JY, et al. The usefulness of fetal MRI for prenatal diagnosis. Yonsei Med J 2007;48(4):671–677. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.4.671.
  7. Glenn OA. MR imaging of fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40(1):68–81. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-009-1459-3.
  8. Limperopoulos C, Robertson Jr RL, Khwaja OS, et al. How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(6):1637–1643. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3036.
  9. D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Garel C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated posterior fossa malformations on prenatal ultrasound imaging (part 1): nomenclature, diagnostic accuracy and associated anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47(6): 690–697. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14900.
  10. Conte G, Parazzini C, Falanga G, et al. Diagnostic value of prenatal MR imaging in the detection of brain malformations in fetuses before the 26th week of gestational age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37(5):946–951. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4639.
  11. Yinon Y, Katorza E, Nassie DI, et al. Late diagnosis of fetal central nervous system anomalies following a normal second trimester anatomy scan. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(10):929–934. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4163.
  12. Reddy UM, Filly RA, Copel JA. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112(1):145–157. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000318871.95090.d9.
  13. Vijaykumar M, Shailaja M, Nilofar M, et al. Detection of structural fetal anomalies in third trimester which usually remains undetected in second trimester. Int J Appl Res 2017;3(2):158–162.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.