Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine Services in Obstetrics and Gynecology during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Preeti Priyadarshani, Roli Purwar, Vibha R Pipal, Ratna P Mall

Keywords : COVID-19, Obstetrics and gynecology, Patient satisfaction, Telemedicine

Citation Information : Priyadarshani P, Purwar R, Pipal VR, Mall RP. Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine Services in Obstetrics and Gynecology during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2021; 13 (6):382-386.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1974

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-03-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: This study aims to explore the patient's experience with telemedicine (TM) as a method of care as well as its long-term implications for the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Telephonic interview was conducted for 78 patients who had availed TM services from April 23, 2020, to June 30, 2020. A predetermined indigenous questionnaire was used to evaluate patient's experiences with TM. Primary outcome was the measurement of level of patient satisfaction and secondary outcome was evaluating the demographic profile of patients. Results: Most respondents were of 21–30 years (42.3%) and 64.1% of respondents were from urban areas. 87.1% respondents were satisfied with the medical care they received; 94.8% respondents did not feel that their doctors hurried through their consultation. 19.2% respondents had encountered difficulty in using smartphones. 70.5% respondents perceived a positive role of TM in reducing their risk of contracting COVID-19. 62.8% respondents showed willingness to continue using TM services after the resumption of routine OPD services. 76.9% respondents felt that currently provided TM services did not need any improvements. 25.6% respondents needed physical visits to doctors even after availing TM services, for routine or emergency complaints. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction is high with TM services, and it can be adopted and incorporated into routine patient care especially in low-resource countries. Clinical significance: TM is expected to increase access to healthcare, while limiting patients’ geographic mobility. The implications and full potential of this service will be clear with long-term studies.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Gettleman J, Schultz K. Modi orders 3-week total lockdown for all 1.3 billion Indians. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. March 24, 2020. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/24/world/asia/india-coronavirus-lockdown.html [Accessed on October 27, 2020].
  2. Board of Governors (in supersession of the Medical Council of India). Telemedicine practice guidelines 2020. MoH&FW. 2020. Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/Telemedicine.pdf [Accessed on October 27, 2020].
  3. WHO. A health telematics policy in support of WHO's Health-For-All strategy for global health development: report of the WHO group consultation on health telematics, 11–16 December, Geneva, 1997. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/63857/WHO_DGO_98.1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed on October 27, 2020].
  4. Craig J, Patterson V. Introduction to the practice of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11(1):3–9. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X0501100102. PMID: 15829036.
  5. Noshir K, Anu M, Alok K, et al. Report on Digital India: technology to transform a connected nation 86–87. McKinsey Global Institute. 2019. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/digital%20india%20technology%20to%20transform%20a%20connected%20nation/digital-india-technology-to-transform-a-connected-nation-full-report.ashx [Accessed on October 27, 2020].
  6. Implementing telehealth in practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 798. American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e73–e79. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/02/implementing-telehealth-in-practice
  7. Greiner AL. Telemedicine applications in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017;60(4):853–866. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000328. PMID: 28990981.
  8. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth. Global Observatory for eHealth Series, 2. 2010.
  9. Pflugeisen BM, Mou J. Patient satisfaction with virtual obstetric care. Matern Child Health J 2017;21(7):1544–1551. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2284-1. PMID: 28176034.
  10. DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, et al. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135(2):371–382. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003646. PMID: 31977782; PMCID: PMC7012339.
  11. Bhandari NR, Payakachat N, Fletcher DA, et al. Validation of newly developed surveys to evaluate patients’ and providers’ satisfaction with telehealth obstetric services. Telemed J E Health 2020;26(7): 879–888. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0156. PMID: 31682181.
  12. Bujnowska-Fedak MM. Trends in the use of the Internet for health purposes in Poland. BMC Public Health 2015;15:194. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1473-3.
  13. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320(7248):1517–1520. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517.
  14. Le LB, Rahal HK, Viramontes MR, et al. Patient satisfaction and healthcare utilization using telemedicine in liver transplant recipients. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64(5):1150–1157. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5397-5. PMID: 30519848.
  15. Lee S, Hitt WC. Clinical applications of telemedicine in gynecology and women's health. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2020;47(2): 259–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.002. PMID: 32451017.
  16. Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed J E Health 2001;7(4):293–316. DOI: 10.1089/1530562015 2814700.
  17. van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2018;20(6):e202. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9262.
  18. Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, et al. Patients’ satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(3): 269–275. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3489-x. PMID: 26269131; PMCID: PMC4762824.
  19. MISSAL. The monthly district health rankings basis a balanced public health scorecard; District ranking score card. May 2018. Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Government of Rajasthan.
  20. Agrawal PK, Pursnani N, Singh AP, et al. Comprehending telemedicine: an online survey amidst COVID-19 pandemic. J South Asian Feder Obstet Gynaecol 2020;12(6):345–347. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1832.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.