How to cite this article: Shah N, Malhotra N, Malhotra J, Garg R, Tank J, Malhotra N.. Cesarean Section: A Storm in a Cup??? J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2017;9(4):291-296.
Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985 Aug;2(8452):436-437.
Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA 2015 Dec;314(21):2263-2270.
WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG 2016 Apr;123(5):667-670.
Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Pediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113.
The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008 Fall;1(4):170-178.
WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (WHO/RHR/15.02).
Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward. Evid Based Med 2016 Dec;21(6):237.
The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Report working paper; 2010.
Can we safely reduce primary cesareans with greater patience? Birth 2014 Sep;41(3):217-219.
Profiteering hospitals are driving alarming rise in C-section deliveries in India [cited 2017, April 21]. Available from: https://thewire.in/125725/c-sections-health-women-pregnancy/
Read more at Medical dialogues: cesarean deliveries better than midpelvic forceps, vacuum deliveries: study. Retrieved from http://speciality.medicaldialogues.in/cesarean-deliveries-better-than-midpelvic-forceps-vacuum-deliveries-study/
