Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate using Robson's Ten Group Classification System and comparing the Trend at a Tertiary Hospital for 2 Years
RC Prameela, Gatta Shilpa, Asma Farha, S Prajwal
Citation Information :
Prameela R, Shilpa G, Farha A, Prajwal S. Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate using Robson's Ten Group Classification System and comparing the Trend at a Tertiary Hospital for 2 Years. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2016; 5 (3):132-138.
Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2: 436-437.
Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: Multicentre prospective study. BMJ 2007 Nov;335(7628): 1025. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55.
Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006 Jun;367(9525):1819-1829.
Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: The WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet 2010;375:490-499.
Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:98-113.
The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: Overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev 2001 Feb;12(1):23-39.
Classifications for cesarean section: A systematic review. PLoS One 2011;6(1):1 e14566
Analysis of caesarean section rate in a tertiary hospital – according to Robson's 10 group classification system (TGCS). IOSR-JDMS 2015 Feb;14(2):46-49.
Method of achieving and maintaining appropriate CS rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013;2.
