Audit: The Strategy to Reduce the Rising Cesarean Section Rates
Miyuru H Manawadu, DV Priyaranjana
Citation Information :
Manawadu MH, Priyaranjana D. Audit: The Strategy to Reduce the Rising Cesarean Section Rates. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2012; 4 (1):5-9.
Rates of caesarean section: Analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiology 2007;21(2):98-113.
Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. WHO 2005, global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006;367(9525): 1796-97.
Methods of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: The WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-2008. Lancet 2010; 375(9713):490-99.
High caesarean rates in Madras (India): A population-based cross-sectional study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003;110: 106-11.
Epidemic of Caesarean sections in Brazil. The Lancet 1991;338:167-69.
Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008;28(1):64-68.
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2007; 176(4):455-60.
Maternal complications associated with caesarean section. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2001;29(4): 322-26.
Why are the caesarean section rates rising? Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001;23:20-27.
The caesarean section rate is rising. Ceylon Medical Journal 2001; 46(iv):147-50.
Green -top Guideline No 45; February 2007: RCOG London.
A guest editorial: Every obstetric department should have a caesarean birth monitor. Obstetrical and Gynaecological Survey 1996;51:703-04.
Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. British Medical Journal 2001;323:1155-58.
Vaginal birth after cesarean: Clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008;198(4):452 e1-10.
Evidence-based strategies for reducing caesarean section rates: A meta-analysis. Birth 2007;34(1):53-64.
Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436-37.
What is the right number of caesarean sections? Lancet 1997;349:815-16.
A guest editorial: What is the correct caesarean rate and how do we get there ? Obstetrical and Gynaecological Survey 2002;57:189-90.
Can the high caesarean section rates be reduced? In: Recent advances in obstetrics and gynaecology. In: Bonar J Dunlop W (Eds). The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd. London 2004;71-84.
Using the medical audit cycle to reduce caesarean section rates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;174(1):199-206.
Analysis of the Caesarean Sections in a University Obstetrics Unit in Galle. Abstracts of the 47th Annual Sessions of the Galle Clinical Society 1987:p13.
The standard primipara as a basis for inter unit comparisons of maternity care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;103(3):223-29.
Nulliparous term singleton vertex caesarean delivery rates: Institutional and individual level predictors. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecolgy 2008;198:694 e1-11.
Clinical report for the year 2007. National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland.
The fetal acoustic stimulation test: A reliable and cost-effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring. The Ceylon Medical Journal 2005; 50(4):156-59.
Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring. The Ceylon Medical Journal 2011;56(1):14-18.
Induction of labor and its outcome in a teaching hospital. Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009;31:97-103.
