Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Creation of Neovagina Using Dental Impression Compound Mold and Skin Graft in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser Syndrome

Krutika Vivek Bhalerao, Sandhya Pajai, Neema Acharya

Keywords : Dental impression mold, McIndoe's technique, Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome, Vaginoplasty

Citation Information : Bhalerao KV, Pajai S, Acharya N. Creation of Neovagina Using Dental Impression Compound Mold and Skin Graft in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser Syndrome. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2024; 16 (2):179-180.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2071

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-02-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: In Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome goal of treatment is to create a sexually functioning neovagina. There are various options available, but the search for the ideal one is still on. The use of dental impression compound for mold covered with skin graft is new. Its mention in literature is very uncommon. Aim: Vaginoplasty using impression compound used by dentists covered by skin graft is being reported to assess anatomical and functional outcomes and to showcase the evolution of vaginoplasty. Case description: A 22-year-old woman with primary amenorrhea due to MRKH syndrome, about to get married in 4 months, underwent vaginoplasty using a dental impression compound covered with a skin graft. The anatomical and functional outcome was satisfying in this woman. On day 8, of vaginoplasty, the length of the vagina formed was 9.4 cm. The vaginal width was three fingers breadth. The functional outcome in relation to sexual satisfaction was good after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusion: Dental impression compound mold with skin graft is an alternative in vaginal genesis as it is cheap and easily available. Proper patient selection, counseling regarding self-replacement, and psychological support are key to the success of vaginoplasty. Clinical significance: The surgical development of a neovagina in MRKH syndrome has been attempted for a long time, with varying degrees of success. So the search for an ideal method is still on.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Liao L-M, Doyle J, Crouch NS, et al. Dilation as treatment for vaginal agenesis and hypoplasia: A pilot exploration of benefits and barriers as perceived by patients. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;26(2):144–148. DOI: 10.1080/01443610500443527.
  2. Committee opinion: no. 562: Müllerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121(5):1134–1137. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429659.93470.ed.
  3. Garcia J, Jones HW. The split thickness graft technic for vaginal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49(3):328–332. PMID: 320526.
  4. Mishra B, Janavar G, Pradeep Y. Indigenous technique of fabricating vaginal mold for vaginal reconstruction and uterine drainage in McIndoe vaginoplasty using 10 ml syringe. Indian J Plast Surg 2016;49(1):76–80. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.182230.
  5. Mishra V, Nanda S, Gandhi K, et al. Vaginoplasty with uterovaginal anastomosis for partial vaginal and complete cervical agenesis: A rare Müllerian anomaly. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2017;9(3):274–276. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1511.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.