Citation Information :
Vasanth UP, Tambawala ZY, Saquib S, Shinko I, Mubarak M, Al Ani K. Trends in Operative Vaginal Delivery at Dubai Hospital: 5-year Retrospective Study. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2024; 16 (2):74-78.
Background: Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) refers to the use of forceps or a vacuum during vaginal delivery, a fundamental component of emergency obstetric and newborn care. But, worldwide, there is a declining trend in the instrumental delivery and increase in cesarean delivery.
Objective: This study aims to assess the current trends, risks, and complications associated with OVD at Dubai Hospital, United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Study design: Retrospective observational study of all women who delivered by OVD over a 5-year period from 2018 to 2022. We collected data on maternal demographics, maternal, and neonatal outcomes and total deliveries.
Results: During the study period, 2.8% of women had successful operative vaginal deliveries. Our incidence remained the same during the study period. We had a total of 273 instrumental deliveries during the study period; out of this, 54.6% were delivered by metal cup, 42% by Kiwi, and 3.3% by forceps. We also noticed the preference of Kiwi over the years as compared with metal vacuum. The most common indication for OVD was fetal distress, accounting for 85.7% of cases. We also noticed a significant increase in OVD for patients on epidural analgesia (14.7% in 2018 vs 43.6% in 2022). Among the patients who underwent instrumental deliveries, 13 cases (4.8% of the total) were identified with 3rd-degree perineal tears. Multiple vaginal lacerations and cervical tears were observed in 25% of the cases. Major perineal tears, the need for suturing in operation theater, and the need for blood transfusion were seen more in women delivered by metal cups as compared with Kiwi and forceps, but not statistically significant. About 13% babies developed neonatal jaundice, and 18.3% babies needed admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Shoulder dystocia is more common in babies delivered by metal cups (4.6%).
Conclusion: Operative vaginal delivery remains a crucial component of obstetric care, with stable incidence. We observed a shifting preference toward the Kiwi vacuum extractor over metal cups while fetal distress remained the primary indication.
Tshering S, Dorji N, Wangden T. Trend in instrumental vaginal deliveries at the national referral hospital in Bhutan: A review of hospital records. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2022;13(6): 431–435. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1987.
Setting standards for emergency obstetric and newborn care. (n.d.). United Nations Population Fund. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/setting-standards-emergency-obstetric-and-newborn-care.
Operative vaginal delivery (Green-top Guideline No. 26). Royal college of obstetrician and gynecologists. [cited 2017 March 13]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg26/.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: Final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67(8):1–50. PMID: 30707672.
Al Riyami N, Al Salmiyah M, Khan D, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of operative vaginal deliveries at a single tertiary center. Oman Med J 2021;36(3):e263. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2021.61.
Faisal S, Bava A, Nandanwar Y. Instrumental vaginal deliveries at tertiary centre. Int J Rep Contracep Obstet Gynecol 2016;5: 4146–4150. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163997.
Dhodapkar SB, Chauhan R. Trend of Instrumental delivery at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Indian J Appl Res 2015;4: 513–515. ISSN: 2249-555X. Available from: https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/recent_issues_pdf/2015/July/July_2015_1435758711_150.pdf.
Zhang VR, Tan EL, Edison PE, et al. Operative vaginal delivery: Practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital. Singapore Med J 2023;64(5):313–318. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2022069.
Hubena Z, Workneh A, Siraneh Y. Prevalence and outcome of operative vaginal delivery among mothers who gave birth at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. J Pregnancy 2018;2018:7423475. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7423475.
Merriam AA, Ananth CV, Wright JD, et al. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005–2013: A population-based study. BJOG 2017;124(9): 1365–1372. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14553.
Murphy DJ. Medico-legal considerations and operative vaginal delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;56:114–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.012.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(12):CD000331. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.
Angioli R, Gómez-Marín O, Cantuaria G, et al. Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: The University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(5):1083–1085. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.105403.
Chaudhari P, Bansal N, Gupta V, et al. A comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal delivery at tertiary health level hospital in Uttarakhand state. Int J Rep Contracep Obstet Gynecol 2016;5(10):3294–3299. DOI: 10.18203/2320–1770.ijrcog20163169.
Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: Population based retrospective analysis. BMJ 2004;329(7456):24–29. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24.
