Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Role of the New UTD Classification System in Prenatal Prediction of Severity and Correlation with Postnatal Outcomes

Deepika Chandrasekaran, Chitra Andrew, Ramesh Babu, Arun Prasad Dharmalingam

Keywords : Antenatal ultrasound, Fetal urinary tract dilation, Fetomaternal outcomes

Citation Information : Chandrasekaran D, Andrew C, Babu R, Dharmalingam AP. Role of the New UTD Classification System in Prenatal Prediction of Severity and Correlation with Postnatal Outcomes. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2023; 15 (6):666-669.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2359

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-12-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Fetal urinary tract dilation (UTD) abnormalities affect 1–5% of all pregnancies. The new UTD classification system was introduced in the year 2014 in order to have uniformity in its diagnosis and management. The present study aims to investigate the clinical utility of the new UTD classification system in antenatal prediction/prognostication of severity. Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center audit of 66 consecutive patients (Jan–Dec 2021) with antenatally diagnosed UTD delivered in our hospital and managed in our pediatric unit postnatally. Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal renal system, both antenatal and postnatal were observed, and UTD-A and UTD-P classification were applied prospectively and retrospectively in all cases as per criteria defined in the new UTD classification. Postnatal outcomes in all cases were evaluated in terms of the need for immediate postnatal surgical intervention and the presence of persistent UTD pathology. Results: There were 51 fetuses in the UTD A1 risk group (Group A) and 15 fetuses in the UTD A2–3 risk group (Group B). Among the groups 10/51 (20%) in UTD A1 group had persistent abnormality [vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) n = 2, non-obstructive dilation (NOD) n = 8] while 12/15 (80%) in UTD A2–3 group had persistent abnormality [pelviureteric junction obstruction (UPJO) n = 1, (NOD) n = 4, (VUR) n = 3, megalourethra n = 1, posterior urethral valve (PUV) n = 3] and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Among UTD A1, 1/51 (2%) needed surgical intervention [(VUR) with urinary tract infection, n = 1], while in UTD A2–3 group 5/15 (33%) [(UPJO) n = 1, megalourethra n = 1, posterior urethral valve (PUV) n = 3] needed surgical intervention (p = 0.001). Conclusion and clinical significance: We found an increased frequency of complications and surgical interventions in infants with antenatal UTD A2–3 grades in the last prenatal scan in comparison with those with UTD A1 grades. The present study reiterates the usefulness of UTD classification.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Woodward M, Frank D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Bju Int 2015;89(2):149–156. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.woodward.2578.x.
  2. Shapiro E. Antenatal hydronephrosis: Here today, gone tomorrow-one way or another: NYU Case of the Month, May 2017. Rev Urol 2017;19(2):138–141. DOI: 10.3909/riu0762.
  3. Orabi M, Abozaid S, Sallout B, et al. Outcomes of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis at first year of life. Oman Med J 2018;33(2):126–132. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2018.24.
  4. Ismaili K, Avni FE, Wissing KM, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of infants with mild and moderate fetal pyelectasis: Validation of neonatal ultrasound as a screening tool to detect significant nephro-uropathies. J Pediatr 2004;144(6):759–765. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.02.035.
  5. Nguyen HT, Herndon CD, Cooper C, et al. The society for fetal urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2010;6(3):212–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.02.205.
  6. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of antenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 2014;10(6):982–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002.
  7. Singh N, Bansal V, Satoskar P, et al. A retrospective analysis to evaluate role of the new UTD classification system in prenatal prediction of severity and postnatal outcome in antenatally diagnosed urinary tract dilatation abnormalities. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2021;71(3): 268–276. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01416-3.
  8. Kaspar CDW, Lo M, Bunchman TE, et al. The antenatal urinary tract classification system accurately predicts severity of kidney and urinary tract abnormalities. J Pediatr Urol 2017;17:30155–30159. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.020.
  9. Morris RK, Malin GL, Khan KS, et al. Antenatal ultrasound to predict postnatal renal function in congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: Systematic review of test accuracy. BJOG 2009;116(10):1290–1299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02194.x.
  10. Zhang H, Zhang L, Guo N. Validation of “urinary tract dilation” classification system: Correlation between fetal hydronephrosis and postnatal urological abnormalities. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99(2):e18707. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018707.
  11. Hodhod A, Capolicchio JP, Jednak R, et al. Evaluation of urinary tract dilation classification system for grading postnatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 2016;195(3):725–730. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.089.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.