Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Robson's 10-group Classification System Analysis of Cesarean Deliveries Performed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Institution

Shashi Lata Kabra, Richa Madaan, Sonal Maheshwari, Pratibha Nanda

Keywords : Cesarean section, Pregnancy, Robson's 10-group classification

Citation Information : Kabra SL, Madaan R, Maheshwari S, Nanda P. Robson's 10-group Classification System Analysis of Cesarean Deliveries Performed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Institution. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2023; 15 (6):643-646.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2324

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-12-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Cesarean section (CS) is defined as the delivery of a fetus through surgical incisions made through the abdominal wall (laparotomy) and the uterine wall (hysterotomy). Cesarean section delivery is to be performed only when it is necessary, as it increases maternal morbidity. There is a substantial rise in the CS rate over the previous three decades, and an objective and scientific analysis of the indications of CS deliveries is necessary to decrease the number. As a result, Robson's classification of global standards has become indispensable. To reduce the rising CS rate, this study used Robson's criteria to analyze the CS trend at a tertiary care teaching hospital. It also identified the proportion of women in each category according to Robson's 10-group categorization scheme and the CS rate among them. Methods: The Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital in New Delhi, served as the site of this retrospective study. Data were gathered from women who underwent cesarean deliveries between January 2022 and January 2023, and proportions in various categories were computed using Robson's 10-group classification scheme. Results: About 33.33% of deliveries at DDU Hospital throughout the study period were CS. Robson group I (21.95%) had the highest level of representation in the study group, followed by Robson groups III (20.89%) and 2 (18.74%), while Robson groups VIII (1.23%) and 9 (0.32%) had the lowest levels. Group II came in second at 7.3%, while the Robson group V contributed the most overall to the CS rate at 12.42%. Group IX had a 100% CS rate despite comprising the smallest proportion of the study group. Conclusion: The most common indication for previous lower segment cesarean section can be reduced by judicious use of trial of labor after cesarean. Every effort must be done to reduce primary CS.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Cagan M, Tanacan A, Hakli DA, et al. Changing rates of the modes of delivery over the decades (1976, 1986, 1996, 2006, and 2016) based on the Robson-10 group classification system in a single tertiary health care center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;34(11):1695–1702. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1644619.
  2. Kirchengast S, Hartmann B. Recent lifestyle parameters are associated with increasing cesarean section rates among singleton term births in Austria. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;16(1):14. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16010014.
  3. Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, et al. Analysis of cesarean sections using Robson's ten group classification system. Pak J Med Sci 2021;37(2):567–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823.
  4. Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, et al. A systematic review of the Robson classification for cesarean section: What works, doesn't work and how to improve it. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e97769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769.
  5. Robson M. The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) – A common starting point for more detailed analysis. BJOG 2015;122(5):701. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13267.
  6. Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;9(9):CD005528. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
  7. FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and Infants During Labour and Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;135(2):232–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001.
  8. Goleman D, Boyatzi R, Mckee A. Robson Classification, Implementation Manual; 2019. pp. 1689–1699.
  9. Khan MA, Sohail I, Habib M. Auditing the cesarean section rate by Robson's ten group classification system at tertiary care hospital. Professional Med J 2020;27(4):700–706. DOI: 10.29309/TPMJ/2020. 27.04.3383.
  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210(3):179–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
  11. Jawa A, Garg S, Bora T, et al. Evaluation of cesarean section rate using Robson's 10 group classification in a tertiary care centre. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2017;16(6):85–89. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1606098589.
  12. Gomathy E, Radhika K, Kondareddy T, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess cesarean section trends in tertiary hospitals. Int J Reprod, Contracept, Obstet Gynecol 2018;7(5):1796. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181905.
  13. Sah S, Goel R, Goel JK. Analysis of cesarean section rate according to Robson's criteria in tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod, Contracept, Obstet Gynecol 2018;7(8). DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182947.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.