Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2023 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Endometrial Compaction in Response to Progesterone Administration and Good Endometrial Vascularity Improves the Clinical Pregnancy Rates in Hormone Replacement Frozen Embryo Transfers

Vidyashree Ganesh Poojari, Prashanth Adiga, Anjali Mundkur, Pratap Narayan, Shreya Sharma

Keywords : Clinical pregnancy rate, Endometrial compaction, Endometrial thickness, Endometrial vascularity, Frozen embryo transfer, Progesterone, Prospective observational study

Citation Information : Poojari VG, Adiga P, Mundkur A, Narayan P, Sharma S. Endometrial Compaction in Response to Progesterone Administration and Good Endometrial Vascularity Improves the Clinical Pregnancy Rates in Hormone Replacement Frozen Embryo Transfers. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2023; 15 (1):47-52.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2199

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 19-04-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose: The current study assessed the effect of endometrial compaction and vascularity on clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET). Methods: Prospective observational study. Endometrial compaction and its vascularity were studied by transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and evaluated CPR. Results: Out of 156 women, 81 had endometrial compaction, 64 had no change in the endometrium, and 11 had an increase in endometrial thickness (ET). Clinical pregnancy rate was 58% among those with endometrial compaction compared to 20.3% among those with no change in ET and 9.1% among those with an increase in ET on the day of FET (p-value < 0.001). Women with 5–10% endometrial compaction, CPR was 61.24%, those with 11–15% compaction had the highest pregnancy rate of 88.2%, and those with compaction of >15% had CPR of 66.6%. Endometrial compaction with zone 3 vascularity had a CPR of 64.2%, and those with zone 4 had 91.7% CPR compared to those with zone 2 vascularity (12.5%), p-value < 0.001. There was poor CPR in women with an increase in ET, though the endometrial vascularity was good. Conclusion: A significant increase in CPR was observed in women who had endometrial compaction with good vascularity of the endometrium, unlike those with poor vascularity. Women with no change or increase in ET had poor pregnancy rates. Hence, assessing the endometrium on the day of starting progesterone and on the day of embryo transfer is essential. If the endometrial compaction has not occurred and/or the endometrial vascularity is poor, the cycle should be considered for cancellation. Clinical significance: Endometrial compaction and good endometrial vascularity are essential for embryo implantation in FET cycles.


PDF Share
  1. Jin Z, Shi H, Lu M, et al. Endometrial thickness changes after progesterone administration do not affect the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: A retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2021;116(6):1502–1512. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.008.
  2. Von Grothusen C, Lalitkumar S, Boggavarapu NR, et al. Recent advances in understanding endometrial receptivity: Molecular basis and clinical applications. Am J Reprod Immunol 2014;72:148–157. DOI: 10.1111/aji.12226.
  3. Miravet-Valenciano JA, Rincon-Bertolin A, Vilella F, et al. Understanding and improving endometrial receptivity. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27(3):187–192. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000173.
  4. Cozzolino M, Diaz-Gimeno P, Pellicer A, et al. Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020;37(12):2989–2997. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01948-7.
  5. Yuan X, Saravelos SH, Wang Q, et al. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2016;33(2):197–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.002.
  6. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20(4):530–541. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011.
  7. Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A, et al. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: An analysis of over 40,000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2018;33(10):1883–1888. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey281.
  8. Mishra VV, Agarwal R, Sharma U, et al. Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity by three-dimensional (3D) power doppler and its correlation with pregnancy outcome in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):521–527. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-016-0871-5.
  9. Singh N, Bahadur A, Mittal S, et al. Predictive value of endometrial thickness, pattern and sub-endometrial blood flows on the day of hCG by 2D doppler in in-vitro fertilization cycles: A prospective clinical study from a tertiary care unit. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011;4(1): 29–33. DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.82357.
  10. Zilberberg E, Smith R, Nayot D, et al. Endometrial compaction before frozen euploid embryo transfer improves ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 2020;113(5):990–995. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.030.
  11. Riestenberg C, Quinn M, Akopians A, et al. Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth rate in single euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021;38(2):407–412. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02043-7.
  12. Ziqi J, Hao S, Manman L, et al. Endometrial thickness changes after progesterone administration do not affect the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: A retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2021;116(6):0015–0282. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.008.
  13. Nagori C, Panchal S. Endometrial Vascularity: Its Relation to Implantation Rates. Int J Infertility Fetal Med 2012;3(2):48–50. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1040.
  14. Haas J, Smith R, Zilberberg E, et al. Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2019;112(3):503–509.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.001.
  15. Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A, et al. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: An analysis of over 40,000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2018;33(10):1883–1888. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey281.
  16. Tabibzadeh S. Proliferative activity of lymphoid cells in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70(2):437–443. DOI:10.1210/jcem-70-2-437.
  17. Youngster M, Mor M, Kedem A, et al. Endometrial compaction is associated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers: A prospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022;39(8):1909–1916. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02544-7.
  18. Bu Z, Yang X, Song L, et al. The impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2019;17(1):99. DOI:10.1186/s12958-019-0545-0.
  19. Ye J, Zhang J, Gao H, et al. Effect of endometrial thickness change in response to progesterone administration on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: Analysis of 4465 cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:546232. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.546232.
  20. Shah J, Nagori C, Panchal S et al. Impact of intraendometrial vascularity on implantation rates in frozen blastocyst transfer. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;15(4): 393–400. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1823.
  21. Malhotra N, Malhotra J, Singh A, et al. Endometrial receptivity and scoring for prediction of implantation and newer markers. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2017;9(2):143–154. Doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1481.
  22. Arora A, Goel JK, Goel R, et al. Ultrasonography and doppler study to predict uterine receptivity in infertile patients undergoing embryo transfer and its correlation with pregnancy rate. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2021;13(3):146–150. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1897.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.