Citation Information :
Rengaraj N, Kubera N, Mondal N, Chitra T, Jha N, Ram A. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes among Women after a Period of Infertility: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2023; 15 (1):29-33.
Purpose: Infertility has been highly prevalent in recent years and has social implications. With the development of novel treatments, there is a rise in complications. This study aims to assess the maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies following a period of infertility.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional analytical study of 140 women admitted to the labor room in a tertiary care center in South India from September 2014 to May 2016 with conceptions following a period of infertility was recruited in group I. A total of 140 controls with spontaneous conceptions within 1 year of married life were recruited in group II. Data were collected using a pre-designed proforma after obtaining informed consent. Various maternal and perinatal outcomes between the two groups were analyzed and compared. Chi-squared test/Fischer's exact test was used to compare the two groups’ outcomes.
Results: The incidence of hypertensive disorders [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2–4.2], gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.7–7.5), and preterm labor (OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.6–7.8) were significantly higher in group I compared to group II. Among the fetal outcome, the number of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (OR = 5.57; 95% CI: 2.5–13.1), low birth weight (LBW) (OR = 3.02; 95% CI: 1.8–4.9), and neonatal morbidity (OR = 7.8; 95% CI: 1.5–14.8) were significantly higher among group I. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the perinatal outcome among the different treatment groups.
Conclusion: Pregnancies following infertility are at a higher risk of some obstetric complications and adverse perinatal outcomes than spontaneous conceptions and hence require close follow-up and timely intervention.
Barbara L. Hoffman, John O, et al. Williams Gynecology, 4th edition. AccessObGyn: McGraw-Hill Medical. Available at: https://obgyn.mhmedical.com/book.aspx?bookID=2658. Accessed date: 25 April 2021.
Cai L, Izumi S, Koido S, et al. Abnormal placental cord insertion may induce intrauterine growth restriction in IVF-twin pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2006;21(5):1285–1290. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei494.
Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD. Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2014;371(1):91–93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1404371.
Sullivan–Pyke CS, Senapati S, Mainigi MA, et al. In vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2017;41(6):345–353. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.001.
Marino JL, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes by mode of assisted conception and subfertility in an Australian data linkage cohort. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e80398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080398.
Thomopoulos C, Tsioufis C, Michalopoulou H, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy-related hypertensive complications: A systematic review. J Hum Hypertens 2013;27(3):148–157. DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2012.13.
Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Templeton A. Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: A 10 year review. Hum Reprod 2001;16(12):2593–2597. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2593.
Baksh L, McGarry J, Bloebaum L, et al. Infertility Treatments and Pregnancy Outcomes in Utah. Prams Perspectives, 2009. Available at: http://www.health.utah.gov/mihp/pdf/Infertiliy.pdf. Access date 31 July 2016.
Raatikainen K, Kuivasaari–Pirinen P, Hippeläinen M, et al. Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes of subfertile women after infertility treatment and in naturally conceived pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2012;27(4):1162–1169. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des015.
Woldringh GH, Frunt MHA, Kremer JAM. Decreased ovarian reserve relates to pre-eclampsia in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2006;21(11):2948–2954. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del155.
Maman E, Lunenfeld E, Levy A, et al. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously. Fertil Steril 1998;70(2):240–245. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00160-5.
Tobias DK, Chavarro JE, Williams MA, et al. History of infertility and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective analysis of 40,773 pregnancies. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178(8):1219–1225. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt110.
Ashrafi M, Gosili R, Hosseini R, et al. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;176:149–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.009.
Serour GI, Aboulghar M, Mansour R, et al. Complications of medically assisted conception in 3,500 cycles. Fertil Steril 1998;70(4):638–642. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00250-7.
Wang JX, Norman RJ, Kristiansson P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum Reprod 2002;17(4):945–949. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.4.945.
Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, et al. In vitro fertilisation in Sweden: Obstetric characteristics, maternal morbidity and mortality. BJOG 2005;112(11):1529–1535. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00745.x.
Egbe TO, Sandjon G, Ourtchingh C, et al. In vitro fertilization and spontaneous pregnancies: Matching outcomes in Douala, Cameroon. Fertil Res Pract 2016;2:1. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-015-0013-2.
Ombelet W, Sutter PD, Elst JV der, et al. Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: Registration, reflection and reaction—the Belgian project. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11(1):3–14. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh048.
Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DAM, Donker D, et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: A systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004;328(7434):261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.37957.560278.EE.
Olson CK, Keppler–Noreuil KM, Romitti PA, et al. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil Steril 2005;84(5):1308–1315. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.086.