Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Threatened Miscarriage and Adverse Fetomaternal Outcome Late in Pregnancy—A Prospective Study

Sumam John, Narayana Panicker Sethu Bai Sreedevi, Rajamma John

Keywords : Fetomaternal outcome, Prospective study, Threatened miscarriage, Vaginal bleeding in pregnancy

Citation Information : John S, Sreedevi NP, John R. Threatened Miscarriage and Adverse Fetomaternal Outcome Late in Pregnancy—A Prospective Study. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2022; 14 (4):387-392.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2100

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The study was aimed to analyze the effect of threatened miscarriage on fetomaternal outcomes late in pregnancy and thereby reduce the morbidity through better antenatal care. Materials and methods: A 1-year prospective observational study on 50 pregnant women with threatened miscarriage and 50 pregnant women with no history of vaginal bleeding was undertaken at Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre from August 2016 to July 2017. Adverse fetomaternal outcomes late in pregnancy were evaluated in both groups. Relative risk was assessed, and the association between threatened miscarriage and various outcomes was analyzed using the Chi-square test. p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The outcomes found to be significantly increased in threatened miscarriage group were preterm labor [18% vs 2%, p = 0.016, OR 10.75 (CI 1.3–88.4)], NICU admission [30% vs 10%, p = 0.023, OR 3.857 (CI 1.278–11.638)], and low birth weight (mean 2.67, SD = 0.53 vs mean 3.03, SD = 0.42). Most of the other outcomes studied were increased in the exposed group compared to the normal pregnancies, but the association was not significant. Conclusion: Preterm labor, low birth weight, and NICU admissions were significantly increased in the threatened miscarriage group. Clinical significance: Anticipation of such outcomes and measures for prediction and prevention is a question to be considered in such pregnancies to optimize the fetomaternal outcome.


PDF Share
  1. Weiss JL, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al. Threatened abortion: a risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome, a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190(3):745–750. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.023.
  2. Jauniaux E, Johns J, Burton GJ. The role of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing and investigating early pregnancy failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25(6):613–624. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1892.
  3. Schauberger CW, Mathiason MA, Rooney BL. Ultrasound assessment of first-trimester bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):333–338. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000151105.53557.27.
  4. Seshadri L, Arjun G. Miscarriage and recurrent pregnancy loss. In: Essentials of Obstetrics. 1st ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015. pp. 405–415.
  5. Hosseini MS, Yaghoubipour S. Late pregnancy outcomes in women with vaginal bleeding in their first trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2013;63(5):311–315. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-013-0389-z.
  6. Lykke JA, Dideriksen KL, Lidegaard O, et al. First-trimester vaginal bleeding and complications later in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115(5):935–944. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da8d38.
  7. Sipilä P, Hartikainen-Sorri AL, Oja H, et al. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by vaginal bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99(12):959–963. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13697.x.
  8. Hossain R, Harris T, Lohsoonthorn V, et al. Risk of preterm delivery in relation to vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;135(2):158–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.003.
  9. Hertz JB, Heisterberg L. The outcome of pregnancy after threatened abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985;64(2):151–156. DOI: 10.3109/00016348509154709.
  10. Funderburk SJ, Guthrie D, Meldrum D. Outcome of pregnancies complicated by early vaginal bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:100–105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04500.x.
  11. Agrawal S, Khoiwal S, Jayant K, et al. Predicting adverse maternal and perinatal outcome after threatened miscarriage. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2014;4(1):1–7. DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2014.41001.
  12. Batzofin JH, Fielding WL, Friedman EA. Effect of vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy on outcome. Obstet Gynecol 63(4):515–518. PMID: 6700898.
  13. Saraswat L, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester: a systematic review. BJOG 2010;117(3):245–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02427.x.
  14. Sun L, Tao F, Hao J, et al. First trimester vaginal bleeding and adverse pregnancy outcomes among Chinese women: from a large cohort study in China. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(8):1297–1301. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.632034.
  15. Williams MA, Mittendorf R, Lieberman E, et al. Adverse infant outcomes associated with first-trimester vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78(1):14–18. PMID: 2047055.
  16. Strobino BA, Pantel-Silverman J. First-trimester vaginal bleeding and the loss of chromosomally normal and abnormal conceptions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157(5):1150–1154. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80280-6.
  17. Wijesiriwardana A, Bhattacharya SS, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric outcome in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(3):557–562. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000199952.82151.de.
  18. Yang J, Hartmann KE, Savitz DA, et al. Vaginal bleeding during pregnancy and preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160(2):118–125. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh180.
  19. Johns J, Hyett J, Jauniaux E. Obstetric outcome after threatened miscarriage with and without a hematoma on ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102(3):483–487. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00580-5.
  20. van Oppenraaij RHF, Jauniaux E, Christiansen OB, et al. Predicting adverse obstetric outcome after early pregnancy events and complications: a review. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15(4):409–421. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp009.
  21. Mulik V, Bethel J, Bhal K. A retrospective population-based study of primigravid women on the potential effect of threatened miscarriage on obstetric outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24(3):249–253. DOI: 10.1080/01443610410001660724.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.