Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Impact of Multimodal Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery Protocol Including Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Recovery after Cesarean Deliveries: An Experience at a Tertiary Hospital in South India

Rohini Kanniga, Shyamala Guruvare, Manjunath Prabhu

Keywords : Cesarean delivery, Multimodal protocol, Postoperative pain, Prospective cohort study, Recovery, Transversus abdominis plane block

Citation Information : Kanniga R, Guruvare S, Prabhu M. Impact of Multimodal Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery Protocol Including Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Recovery after Cesarean Deliveries: An Experience at a Tertiary Hospital in South India. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2022; 14 (2):117-121.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2035

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 21-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The study aims to compare postoperative pain and recovery with a tailored multimodal Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery (mERCD) protocol and conventional postoperative management protocol after elective cesarean delivery. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study involved women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. One group of women received the new multimodal ERCD (mERCD) protocol, and the other group, conventional management. The mERCD group had transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, gum chewing, early oral initiation, and urinary catheter removal. The conventional group received standard analgesia, started on orals, and had catheter removal at 24 hours. We compared postoperative pain and recovery between the groups at 6 and 24 hours using a visual analog scale (VAS) and predefined variables assessing recovery. Results: Pain scores at rest in mERCD group and the conventional group were 4.20 and 6.19 at 6 hours (p = 0.005) and 3.71 and 4.1 at 24 hours (p = 0.018). Respective pain scores with the movement were 4.84 and 6.35 (p = 0.005) at 6 hours and 3.74 and 4.91 at 24 hours (p = 0.005). Return of bowel sounds at 6 hours was 100% and 123 (82%) in mERCD and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.005). In mERCD group, 49 (70%) passed flatus at or before 24 hours, whereas in the conventional protocol group, the same it happened before 24 hours in 84 (56%) (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the time taken to pass urine after catheter removal; the mERCD group had higher satisfaction scores 7.02 SD 1.16 than 4.05 SD 1.06 in the conventional group (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Multimodal Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery protocol effectively improved women's postoperative experience by providing good analgesia and enhancing early recovery. Clinical significance: Hospitals must adopt a tailored multimodal early recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach to enhance postoperative recovery after cesarean delivery.


PDF Share
  1. Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219(6):523.e1–523.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.015.
  2. Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219(6):533–544. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.006.
  3. Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221(3):247.e1–247.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012.
  4. Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, et al. Society for obstetric anesthesia and perinatology: consensus statement and recommendations for enhanced recovery after cesarean. Anesth Analg 2021;132(5): 1362–1377. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005257.
  5. Chansoria S, Hingwe S, Sethi A, et al. Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean section. J Recent Adv Pain 2015;1:13–17. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10046-0005.
  6. Srivastava U, Verma S, Singh TK, et al. Efficacy of trans abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, randomised trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9(3):298–302. DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.154732.
  7. Mankikar MG, Sardesai SP, Ghodki PS. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60(4):253–257. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.179451.
  8. Jadon A, Jain P, Chakraborty S, et al. Role of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block as a component of multimodal analgesia regimen for lower segment caesarean section: a randomised double-blind clinical study. BMC Anesthesiol 2018;18(1):53. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0512-x.
  9. Steinhagen E. Enhanced recovery after surgery: it's time to change practice! Nutr Clin Pract 2016;31(1):18–29. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615622640.
  10. Brogi E, Kazan R, Cyr S, et al. Transversus abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 2016;63(10):1184–1196. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-016-0679-x.
  11. Wen Z, Shen M, Wu C, et al. Chewing gum for intestinal function recovery after caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17(1):105. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1286-8.
  12. Ciardulli A, Saccone G, Di Mascio D, et al. Chewing gum improves postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31(14):1924–1932. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330883.
  13. Multan SA, Farouk D, Youssef D. The relation between gum chewing in early postoperative period and the return of gastrointestinal function after caesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2019;10(6):408–412. DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2019.10.00475.
  14. Saad AF, Saoud F, Diken ZM, et al. Early versus late feeding after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2016;33(4):415–419. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565918.
  15. Mohammed MZ, Marzouk T, Barakat R, et al. Early versus late oral feeding on selected post cesarean section outcomes. IOSR-NHS 2016;5(4):43–47. DOI: 10.9790/1959-0504054347.
  16. Basbug A, Yuksel A, Kaya AE. Early versus delayed removal of indwelling catheters in patients after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomised trial. J Maternal Fetal Neonat Med 2018;33(1):68–72. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1487394.
  17. Pujic B, Kendrisic M, Shotwell M, et al. A survey of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for cesarean delivery in Serbia. Front Med 2018;5:100. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00100.
  18. Coates E, Fuller G, Hind D, et al. Enhanced recovery pathway for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2016;27:94–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.05.005.
  19. Ituk U, Habib AS. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018;7(F1000 Faculty Rev):513. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13895.1.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.