Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2020 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Third-trimester Cerebroplacental Ratio as a Predictor of Neonatal Outcome in a Low-risk Pregnancy

Nandita K Maitra, Pragati Prajapati, Tosha M Sheth, Palak Vaishnav, Purvi K Patel

Citation Information : Maitra NK, Prajapati P, Sheth TM, Vaishnav P, Patel PK. Third-trimester Cerebroplacental Ratio as a Predictor of Neonatal Outcome in a Low-risk Pregnancy. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2020; 12 (3):150-154.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1781

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-11-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objective: To study the role of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes and mode of delivery in low-risk women at 37–41 weeks’ gestation. Materials and methods: Three hundred and seventy low-risk women with singleton pregnancy at 37–41 weeks of gestation, with known last menstrual period (LMP), were prospectively evaluated over a period of 1 year in a medical college setting. Doppler examination was performed and the indices recorded. Defined maternal and neonatal outcomes were studied. Nonparametric tests such as test for comparison of population means, test for comparison of proportions, and tests of diagnostic accuracy were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the area under the curve. Results: Total 78 subjects had CPR below 5th centile. The mean CPR value at the 5th centile was 1.2. The mean (SD) of CPR for the total population was 1.48 (+0.39); the mean (SD) value for CPR was lowest for the infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (1.12 ± 0.22). The CPR below the 5th centile had an independent association with APGAR < 7 at 5 minutes, induced labor, and NICU admission. Birth weight centile did not affect this association. Conclusion: The CPR below the 5th centile was associated with a higher risk of obstetric intervention for intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse perinatal outcomes in subjects with low-risk pregnancy at term.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(2):124.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.016.
  2. Cerebroplacental ratio in fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(1):5–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.024.
  3. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211(3):288.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008.
  4. Poor neonatal acid–base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(2):156–161. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14647.
  5. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2(2):CD005122. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005122.pub4.
  6. Amniotic fluid index at admission in labour as predictor of intrapartumfetal status. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31(5):393–395. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.570811.
  7. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30–34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(4):409–420. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14822.
  8. org/calc/.
  9. gestation.net/cc/10/624762.htm.
  10. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30(3):287–296. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4088.
  11. Are babies that fail to reach their genetic growth potential at increased risk of intra-partum fetal compromise? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46(4):460–464. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14758.
  12. Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta 2017;54:68–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.02.006.
  13. Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216(6):606.e1–606.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.005.
  14. The value of the cerebroplacental ratio for the prediction of intrapartum fetal monitoring in low-risk term pregnancies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2017;82(5):475–480. DOI: 10.1159/000452664.
  15. Cerebroplacental ratio thresholds measured within two weeks of birth and the risk of cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52(3):340–346. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17542.
  16. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;51(3):381–386. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17458.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.