Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

“Hysterectomy by Vaginal Route,” not a Pressure

Sithara Dharmarajan

Keywords : Benign gynecological disorders, Hysterectomy, Nondescent vaginal hysterectomy, Non prolapsed uterus

Citation Information : Dharmarajan S. “Hysterectomy by Vaginal Route,” not a Pressure. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2019; 11 (5):281-282.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1709

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Vaginal route of hysterectomy is a safe procedure with less morbidity and hospital stay. So there is a need to expand the indication for vaginal hysterectomy beyond uterovaginal prolapse. Aim: To determine the feasibility and outcome of nondescent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) and to assess pre and postoperative complications, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between 2012 and 2014 at a tertiary care center. Two hundred fifty-six patients satisfying the selection criteria of hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions, uterus size <16 weeks and excluding stage IV endometriosis, genital tract malignancy, and uterine prolapse were included. Nondescent vaginal hysterectomy was performed by the standard technique and the following parameters were recorded: age, parity, indication for surgery, duration of surgery, intra operative and postoperative complications, and hospital stay. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 by frequency and percentage analysis using Chi-squared test. Results: All 256 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 44.4 ± 6.1 years, fibroid uterus was the commonest indication, 89.4% had a uterine size ≤12 weeks, and 59% had uterine volume <200 cm3. The mean duration of surgery was 83.5 ± 11.0 minutes; salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 25.8% of the patients. Intraoperatively 1.2% had bladder injury and 0.4% required conversion to laparotomy for pelvic hematoma. The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.9 ± 2.2 days and the mean pain score in NRS pain scale was 3.0 ± 0.3. Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in 1.9% of the patients only. Conclusion: Nondescent vaginal hysterectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for benign gynecological disorders. Clinical significance: Nondescent vaginal hysterectomy is a boon in this techno-savvy era by reducing the morbidity and promising early return to work.

  1. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, et al. Hysterectomy in the united state 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:549–555. DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00011.
  2. Mc Pherson K, Metcalfe MA, Herbett A, et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. BJOG 2004;111(7):688–694. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00174.x.
  3. ACOG committee opinion no. 444. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(5): 1156–1158. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Precis I, An update in obstetrics and gynecology. CD-ROM. Washington DC 1989.
  5. Sheth SS, Shah NM. Pre operative sonographic estimation of uterine volume: an aid in determining the route of hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 2002;18(1):13–22. DOI: 10.1089/104240602753595458.
  6. Alokananda R, Luna P, Roshan B, et al. Non descent vaginal hysterectomy: a constantly improving surgical art. J Obstet Gynec India 2011;61(2):182–188. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0021-z.
  7. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists women's Health care physicians, Washington DC (USA) 2006. pp. 13–14.
  8. Sheth SS. Vaginal hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005;19(3):307–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.011.
  9. Garg PK, Deka D, Malhotra N. Non descent vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions. A better proposition than abdominal hysterectomy. Obst Gynae Today 2002;7(6):345–346.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.