Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Lower Segment Cesarean Section in Second Stage of Labor: Comparison of Patwardhan Method with Conventional Pushing Method (A 3-year Study)

Nihar R Bhoi, Lalmohan Nayak, Mitanjali Sethy, Kumudini Pradhan, Prakash Mishra, Tusar Mahapatra, Prosun Bera

Keywords : LSCS, NICU, Patwardhan technique, Second stage of labor

Citation Information : Bhoi NR, Nayak L, Sethy M, Pradhan K, Mishra P, Mahapatra T, Bera P. Lower Segment Cesarean Section in Second Stage of Labor: Comparison of Patwardhan Method with Conventional Pushing Method (A 3-year Study). J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2019; 11 (4):263-265.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1707

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Objective: To compare the fetomaternal outcome in Patwardhan technique vs “Push” method when lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) done in second stage of labor. Materials and methods: A prospective analysis of all cesarean sections performed in advanced labor with deeply waged head in VSS Medical College and Hospital, Burla, Odisha, India, during the years from April 2012 to March 2015. The cases were divided into two groups randomly; group I (deliveries by Patwardhan technique) and group II (Push method). Results: Out of 420 number of LSCS needed operation in 2nd stage of labor, in 129 cases, babies were delivered by Patwardhan technique and in 291 cases, delivery was conducted by Push method. 11.5% of cases among push/pull group had unwanted extension of uterine incision, whereas none had extension in Patwardhan group (p < 0.0001). Thirteen percent cases in group II, whereas 4.5% in group I required blood transfusion (p < 0.0001). The mean duration of hospital stay was not significantly different in both the groups (p = 0.06). There was requirement of NICU care in 23.2% cases in group I vs 28.8% in group II. Conclusion: In cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section in second stage, Patwardhan technique is very useful in reducing fetomaternal morbidity and is the preferred method as compared to push and pull method.

  1. Evaluation of cesarean delivery, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Women's Health Care Physicians, 409 12th Street, SW, PO Box 96920, Washington, DC 20090-6920 ACOG 2000.
  2. Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z, et al. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;121(1):24–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014.
  3. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109(4): 917–921. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe.
  4. Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, et al. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labor, a randomized comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynecol 2002;22(4):375–378. DOI: 10.1080/01443610220141290.
  5. Sung JF, Daniels KI, Brodzinsky L, et al. Caesarean delivery outcome after a prolonged second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197(3):306.e1–306.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.005.
  6. Saha PK, Gulati R, Goel P, et al. Second stage caesarean section: evaluation of Patwardhan technique. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(1):93–95. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6709.3782.
  7. Khosla AH, Dahiya K, Sangwan K. Caesarean section in a wedged head. Ind J Med Sci 2003;57(5):187–191.
  8. Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. BJOG 2005;112(7): 986–990. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x.
  9. Patwardhan BD, Motashaw ND. Caesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol India 1957;8:1–15.
  10. Cebekulu L, Buchmann EJ. Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95(2):110–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.06.026.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.