Citation Information :
Satoskar P, Singh A, Narkhede H. A Study to Assess the Association between Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal Outcomes. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2019; 11 (4):243-245.
Aim: To analyze whether antenatal second trimester umbilical coiling index measurement could predict adverse perinatal outcome. Materials and methods: A study designed was a prospective observational study, enrolled total 100 singleton pregnancies, who were fulfilling inclusion criteria, attending regular antenatal checkup and willing for institutional deliveries. Each case was evaluated by sonographic study for umbilical coiling index at the time of routine fetal anatomical survey between 18 weeks and 24 weeks and then followed up for evaluation of perinatal outcome. Results: In present study, 79% had normocoiling while 10% had hypocoiling and 11% had hypercoiling of cord. Of these, 5% had preterm deliveries which was statistically significant (p = 0.046). Also, meconium-stained liquor was noted in 10% cases, among which 50% had abnormal coiling index. This was statistically significant (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Measuring coiling index can help in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes resulting in closer fetal monitoring and improved fetal outcome. Clinical significance: Antenatal umbilical cord coiling index (aUCI) is an important parameter to be studied during second trimester which may help to screen patients at risk of adverse perinatal outcome.
Dyawapur A. A correlational study to assess the umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcomes in selected hospitals at Bijapur. IOSR J Nurs Health Sci 2016;5(4):82–87. DOI: 10.9790/1959-0504038287.
Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA. Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umblical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85(4):573–577. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00435-G.
Gupta S, Faridi MMA, Krishnan J. Umbilical coiling index. J Obstet Gynecol India 2006;56(4):315–319.
Edmonds HW. The spiral twist of normal umbilical cords in twins and singlestone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954;67(1):102–120. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(54)90201-X.
Strong TH, Jarles DL, Vega JS, et al. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(1 Pt 1):29–32. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70378-7.
Lacro RV, Jones KL, Benirschke K. The umbilical cord twist: origin, direction, and relevance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157(4 Pt 1): 833–838. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80067-4.
Qin Y, Lau TK, Rogers MS. Second trimester ultrasonographic assessment of the umbilical coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20(5):458–463. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00846.x.
Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a lean umbilical cord: a simple marker of the fetuses at risk. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13(3):157–160. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13030157.x.
Padmanabhan LD, Mhaskar R, Mhaskar A. Umbilical vascular coiling and the perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India 2001;51(6):43–44.
Devaru D, Meghna T. Umbilical coiling index & the perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India 2012;62(1):43–46. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-012-0158-4.
Nakamura M, Hasegawa J, Matsuaka R. Risk analysis for the birth of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant. Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2010;13(2):1–5.
de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, et al. Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(5): 1049–1055. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000209197.84185.15.
Peng HQ, Levitin-Smith M, Rochelson B, et al. Umbilical cord stricture and over-coiling are common causes of fetal demise. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2006;9(1):14–19. DOI: 10.2350/05-05-0051.1.