Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial Depicting Postoperative Pain Score Following Port-site Infiltration during Laparoscopy

Tanzeem S Chowdhury, Mehnaz Mustary, Towhidul Anowar Chowdhury

Keywords : Bupivacaine, Laparoscopy, Port-site pain, Postoperative analgesics

Citation Information : Chowdhury TS, Mustary M, Chowdhury TA. A Randomized Controlled Trial Depicting Postoperative Pain Score Following Port-site Infiltration during Laparoscopy. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2019; 11 (4):230-234.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1693

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: This study was aimed to determine the efficacy of local bupivacaine injection into the incision site before diagnostic laparoscopy to reduce postoperative pain among infertile patients. Materials and methods: This was a randomized controlled study on 168 consecutive infertile women who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy at Farida Clinic and Infertility Management Center, Dhaka, from February to November 2018. Twenty-two patients were excluded from the study due to not meeting the criteria and 144 patients were finally taken for randomization. Results: In this study, majority of patients (n = 79) belonged to age 21–30 years. The mean age was found to be 29.7 ± 4.5 years in group I and 30.2 ± 4.7 years in group II. Majority of the patients had primary infertility in both groups, which was 47 (65.3%) in group I and 57 (79.2%) in group II. The commonest comorbidity was hypothyroidism found in both groups, 9 (12.5%) in group I and 7 (9.7%) in group II. Nine (12.5%) patients had previous operation in group I and 13 (18.1%) in group II. This study showed that majority of patients had mild pain 1 hour after surgery-48 (66.7%) in group I and 50 (69.4%) in group II. Three hours after surgery majority of patients in both groups had no pain 43 (59.7%) in group I and 40 (55.6%) in group II. Twelve hours after surgery, there was no pain in 64 patients (88.9%) in group I and 65 patients (90.3%) in group II. After 7 days of surgery, postoperative pain was absent in 45 (62.5%) patients in group I and 42 (58.3%) patients in group II, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the result of the study, at 1, 3, 12 hours and 7 days after surgery, pain score was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) between intervention and nonintervention groups. So, port-site infiltration of bupivacaine does not reduce the postoperative pain following laparoscopy.

  1. Rawal N, Allvin R, Amilon A. Postoperative analgesia at home after ambulatory hand surgery: a controlled comparison of tramadol, metamizol and paracetamol. Anesth Analg 2001;92(2):347–351. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200102000-00013.
  2. Paul FW. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2005; 101(5 Suppl):S5–S22. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000177099.28914.a7.
  3. Bisgaard T. Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 2006;104(4):835–846. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200604000-00030.
  4. Vadivelu N, Mitra S, Schermer E, et al. Preventive analgesia for postoperative pain control: a broader concept. Local Reg Anesth 2014;7:17–22. DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S62160.
  5. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Committee on Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals. Hamilton Press; 1996.
  6. Malhotra N, Chanana C, Roy KK, et al. To compare the efficacy of two doses of intraperitoneal bupivacaine for pain relief after operative laparoscopy in gynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;274(4): 323–326. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0337-1.
  7. Chundrigar T, Hadges AR, Morris R, et al. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75(6):437–439.
  8. Agrawal S, Pai S. Evaluation of postoperative pain relief with intra-peritoneal bupivacaine instillation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a randomized control study. Int Surg J 2017;4:1195–1200. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170987.
  9. Shalan H, Badaway A, Yousef H, et al. Effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine on post-operative pain following laparoscopic pelvic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc 2002;11(6):371–375. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2508.2002.00557.x.
  10. Hasaniya N, Zayed F, Faiz H, et al. Pre-insertion local anesthesia at the trocar site improves peri-operative pain and decreases costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15(9):962–964. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000294.
  11. Goldstein A, Grimault P, Henique A, et al. Preventing postoperative pain by local anesthetic instillation after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery- a placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Anaesth Analg 2000;91(2):403–407. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200008000-00032.
  12. Ozmen S, Ozmen OA, Kasapoglu F. Effects of levo-bupivacaine v. bupivacaine infiltration on postoperative analgesia in pediatric tonsillectomy patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120(7):489–493. DOI: 10.1177/000348941112000712.
  13. Cantore F, Boni L, Di Giuseppe M, et al. Pre-incision local infiltration with levobupivacaine reduces pain and analgesic consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a new device for day-case procedure. Int J Surg 2008;6(Suppl 1):S89–S92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.033.
  14. Bhardwaj N, Sharma V, Chari P. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine instillation for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anaesth 2002;46(1):49–52.
  15. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1989;69:563–569. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198911000-00003.
  16. Gutton C, Bellefleur JP, Puppo S, et al. Lidocaine v. ropivacaine for perineal infiltration post-episiotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;122(1):33–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.028.
  17. Cotirlet A, Nedelcu M, Popa E, et al. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2014;109:769–773.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.