Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Prediction of Early Pregnancy Loss by Ultrasound Markers

Ruby Sultana, Rema Nambiar, Parvati Bhat, Shashikala Bhat

Keywords : Early pregnancy loss, Fetal bradycardia, Small gestational sac, Ultrasound, Yolk sac miscarriage

Citation Information : Sultana R, Nambiar R, Bhat P, Bhat S. Prediction of Early Pregnancy Loss by Ultrasound Markers. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2019; 11 (3):185-189.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1685

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Background: The purpose of the present study is to determine the performance of ultrasound markers in transvaginal scan (TVS) for the diagnosis of early pregnancy loss (EPL). Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study of 365 women undergoing initial TVS at between 6 weeks and 10 weeks of gestation. Demographic data were collected. Ultrasound parameters like gestational sac diameter (GSD), yolk sac diameter (YSD), crown rump length (CRL), and embryonic heart rate (HR) were studied at the booking visit, and patients with an inconclusive scan report were asked for follow up after a week or 10 days. Outcome: The measured outcome was first trimester (up to 14 weeks) pregnancy loss. Univariate analysis was done to compare both groups. Receiver-operating curve (ROC) was derived to find out the best cutoff value for studied parameters. Results: Among 365 recruited patients, outcome was known for 91.7% (n = 335). Of 335 analyzed subjects, 272 had ongoing pregnancy (group I) and 63 had miscarriage (group II). Univariate analysis showed significant association of age, symptoms like bleeding per vagina, suprapubic pain, and low GSD, CRL, HR, and difference of GSD CRL with EPL (p < 0.05). Detection of EPL was highest for HR below 5th centile (57%). Best cutoff values were derived for all parameters in ROC and it was found that GSD value of less than 20 mm had sensitivity of 60% with 77% specificity; for CRL of less than 7.5 mm, it was 61% and 75%; and for HR less than 85 bpm, it was 85% and 99%, respectively. The GSD CRL difference of less than 8.5 mm was found highly sensitive (91%) for prediction of EPL on ROC cutoff. Conclusion: We conclude that calculating GSD, YSD, CRL, and HR at 6th–10th gestational weeks was significant in predicting gestational prognosis. Low embryonic HR (<85 bpm) was found to be an excellent performer in prediction of EPL through ROC. This study emphasizes further on the importance of performing obstetric ultrasound scan with precision and mindfulness.

  1. Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, et al. Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: A consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Hum Reprod 2015;30(3):495–498. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu299.
  2. Simpson JL. Causes of Fetal Wastage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50(1). DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31802f11f6.
  3. Papaioannou GI, Syngelaki A, et al. Ultrasonographic prediction of early miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2011;26(7):1685–1692. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der130.
  4. Wie JH, Choe S, et al. Sonographic parameters for prediction of miscarriage role of 3-dimensional volume measurement. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34(10):1777–1784. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.14.09012.
  5. Jakal A, Görgen H, et al. The Role of Ultrasound in Early Pregnancy in Prediction of Miscarriages 2007;15:20–25.
  6. Makrydimas G, Sebire NJ, et al. Fetal loss following ultrasound diagnosis of a live fetus at 6-10 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22(4):368–372. DOI: 10.1002/uog.204.
  7. Huchon C, Deffieux X, et al. Pregnancy loss: French clinical practice guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;201:18–26.
  8. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 2000;320(7251): 1708–1712. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708.
  9. Levin AA, Schoenbaum SC, et al. Association of induced abortion with subsequent pregnancy loss. JAMA 1980;243(24):2495–2499. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1980.03300500021020.
  10. Winter E, Wang J, et al. Early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Hum Reprod 2002;17(12): 3220–3223. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3220.
  11. Hu X, Miao M, et al. Reproductive Factors and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion in the Jinchang Cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(11):2444. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112444.
  12. Falco P, Milano V, et al. Sonography of pregnancies with first-trimester bleeding and a viable embryo: a study of prognostic indicators by logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7(3): 165–169. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030165.x.
  13. Dickey RP, Gasser R, et al. Relationship of initial chorionic sac diameter to abortion and abortus karyotype based on new growth curves for the 16th to 49th post-ovulation day. Hum Reprod 1994;9(3):559–565. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138544.
  14. Oh JS, Wright G, et al. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20(3):267–269. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00774.x.
  15. Adiga P, Selvi C, et al. Evaluation of Yolk Sac Diameter and Embryonic Heart Rate as Prognostic Factors of Gestational Outcome in Early Singleton Pregnancies. Sch J App Med Sci 2015;3:543–550.
  16. Rodgers SK, Chang C, et al. Normal and Abnormal US Findings in Early First-Trimester Pregnancy: Review of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound 2012 Consensus Panel Recommendations. Radiographics 2015;35(7):2135–2148. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150092.
  17. Tan S, Ipek A, et al. Irregular yolk sac shape: is it really associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion? J Ultrasound Med 2011;30(1):31–36. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.31.
  18. Varelas FK, Prapas NM, et al. Yolk sac size and embryonic heart rate as prognostic factors of first trimester pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138(1):10–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.023.
  19. Bottomley C, Van Belle V, et al. Accurate prediction of pregnancy viability by means of a simple scoring system. Hum Reprod 2013;28(1):68–76. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des352.
  20. Abuelghar WM, Fathi HM, et al. Can a smaller than expected crown-rump length reliably predict the occurrence of subsequent miscarriage in a viable first trimester pregnancy? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39(10):1449–1455. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12082.
  21. Altay MM, Yaz H, et al. The assessment of the gestational sac diameter, crown-rump length, progesterone and fetal heart rate measurements at the 10th gestational week to predict the spontaneous abortion risk. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009;35(2):287–292. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00927.x.
  22. Bromley B, Harlow BL, et al. Small sac size in the first trimester: a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Radiology 1991;178(2):375–377. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987595.
  23. D'Antonio F, Khalil A, et al. Embryonic growth discordance and early fetal loss: the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort and systematic review. Hum Reprod 2013;28(10):2621–2627. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det277.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.