Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2018 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Triple Intrauterine Devices: A Rare Case

Wint-Thida Htay, Sukson Chaiviratttana, Amornrat Thanachiviwat

Keywords : Extrauterine, Intrauterine device, Laparoscopy uterine perforation.

Citation Information : Htay W, Chaiviratttana S, Thanachiviwat A. Triple Intrauterine Devices: A Rare Case. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae 2018; 10 (3):225-226.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1595

Published Online: 01-09-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

This was the rare case of three intra-uterine devices (IUD) in one lady. One was lost, another was translocated intra-abdominally, and the other was still functioning for 20 years. This report highlighted the importance of in-depth knowledge of health education, proper diagnostic evaluation and the role of laparoscopy in this management.


PDF Share
  1. Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Risk of uterineperforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015April;91(4): 274-279.
  2. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices: Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception. 1998 April;57(4):251-255.
  3. Caliskan E, Oztürk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. The European Journal of Contraceptionand Reproductive Health Care. 2003 Sept;8(3):150-155.
  4. Boortz HE, Margolis DJ, Ragavendra N, Patel MK, Kadell BM. Migration of Intrauterine Devices: Radiologic Findings and Implications for Patient Care. Radio Graphics. 2012; 32(2):335- 352.
  5. Kho KA, Chamsy DJ. Perforated Intraperitoneal Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices: Diagnosis, Management and Clinical Outcomes. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2014;21(4):596-601.
  6. Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine Contraception After Cesarean Section and During Lactation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Women's Health 2013 Dec 4;5:811-818.
  7. Goldstuck ND, Wildesmeerch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforationandexpulsion. International Journal of Women's Health. 2014 Aug 7;6:735- 744.
  8. Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory. Contraception. 2002;66:105-108.
  9. Adoni A, Ben Chetrit A. The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception. 1991 Jan;43(1):77-81.
  10. Chen CP, Hsu TC, Wang W. Ileal penetration by a Multiload- Cu375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature. Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5): 295-304.
  11. Heinberg EM, McCoy TW, Resad P. The Perforated Intrauterine Device: Endoscopic Retrieval. JSLS. 2008;12(1): 97-100.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.